These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

412 related items for PubMed ID: 17702366

  • 1. Outcome after aortic valve replacement: comparison of homografts with mechanical prostheses.
    Kilian E, Oberhoffer M, Kaczmarek I, Bauerfeind D, Kreuzer E, Reichart B.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2007 Jul; 16(4):404-9. PubMed ID: 17702366
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. The homograft aortic valve: a 29-year, 99.3% follow up of 1,022 valve replacements.
    O'Brien MF, Harrocks S, Stafford EG, Gardner MA, Pohlner PG, Tesar PJ, Stephens F.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2001 May; 10(3):334-44; discussion 335. PubMed ID: 11380096
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Evaluation of valve-related complications in patients with Sorin Bicarbon prosthesis: a seven-year experience.
    Bortolotti U, Milano A, D'Alfonso A, Piccin C, Mecozzi G, Magagna P, Fabbri A, Mazzucco A.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2001 Nov; 10(6):795-801. PubMed ID: 11767189
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Re-do aortic valve replacement: does a previous homograft influence the operative outcome?
    Kumar P, Athanasiou T, Ali A, Nair S, Oz BS, DeSouza A, Moat N, Shore DF, Pepper JR.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2004 Nov; 13(6):904-12; discussion 912-3. PubMed ID: 15597580
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Biological versus mechanical aortic prosthesis? A nineteen-year comparison in a propensity-matched population.
    Bottio T, Rizzoli G, Caprili L, Testolin L, Thiene G, Gerosa G.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 Jul; 14(4):493-500. PubMed ID: 16116876
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Outcome after aortic valve replacement in young adults: is patient profile more important than prosthesis type?
    Klieverik LM, Noorlander M, Takkenberg JJ, Kappetein AP, Bekkers JA, van Herwerden LA, Bogers AJ.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2006 Jul; 15(4):479-87; discussion 487. PubMed ID: 16901039
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Five-year follow up of the ATS mechanical heart valve.
    Emery RW, Krogh CC, Jones DJ, Nicoloff DM, Blake DP, Arom KV.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2004 Mar; 13(2):231-8. PubMed ID: 15086262
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Evolution of aortic valve replacement in children: a single center experience.
    Ruzmetov M, Vijay P, Rodefeld MD, Turrentine MW, Brown JW.
    Int J Cardiol; 2006 Nov 10; 113(2):194-200. PubMed ID: 16376439
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Prospective evaluation of aortic valve replacement in young adults and middle-aged patients: mechanical prosthesis versus pulmonary autograft.
    Concha M, Aranda PJ, Casares J, Merino C, Alados P, Muñoz I, Villalba R, Ariza J.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 Jan 10; 14(1):40-6. PubMed ID: 15700435
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Results of aortic valve replacement with pulmonary and aortic homografts.
    Naegele H, Bohlmann M, Döring V, Kalmar P, Rödiger W.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2000 Mar 10; 9(2):215-20; discussion 220-1. PubMed ID: 10772039
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. The Bicarbon heart valve prosthesis: short-term results.
    Casselman F, Herijgers P, Meyns B, Flameng W, Daenen W.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1997 Jul 10; 6(4):410-5. PubMed ID: 9263874
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Mechanical aortic and mitral valve replacement in infants and children.
    Sachweh JS, Tiete AR, Mühler EG, Groetzner J, Gulbins H, Messmer BJ, Daebritz SH.
    Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2007 Apr 10; 55(3):156-62. PubMed ID: 17410500
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Performance of bioprostheses and mechanical prostheses in age group 61-70 years.
    Prasongsukarn K, Jamieson WR, Lichtenstein SV.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 Jul 10; 14(4):501-8, 510-1; discussion 509. PubMed ID: 16116877
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Valve-related events after aortic root replacement with cryopreserved aortic homografts.
    Kaya A, Schepens MA, Morshuis WJ, Heijmen RH, Brutel de la Riviere A, Dossche KM.
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2005 May 10; 79(5):1491-5. PubMed ID: 15854921
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Pulmonary homografts for aortic valve replacement: long-term comparison with aortic grafts.
    Vogt F, Kowert A, Beiras-Fernandez A, Oberhoffer M, Kaczmarek I, Reichart B, Kilian E.
    Heart Surg Forum; 2011 Aug 10; 14(4):E237-41. PubMed ID: 21859642
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Surgical treatment of active native aortic valve endocarditis with allografts and mechanical prostheses.
    Klieverik LM, Yacoub MH, Edwards S, Bekkers JA, Roos-Hesselink JW, Kappetein AP, Takkenberg JJ, Bogers AJ.
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2009 Dec 10; 88(6):1814-21. PubMed ID: 19932241
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Mechanical versus bioprosthetic valve replacement in middle-aged patients.
    Kulik A, Bédard P, Lam BK, Rubens FD, Hendry PJ, Masters RG, Mesana TG, Ruel M.
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2006 Sep 10; 30(3):485-91. PubMed ID: 16857373
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Late outcomes following freestyle versus homograft aortic root replacement: results from a prospective randomized trial.
    El-Hamamsy I, Clark L, Stevens LM, Sarang Z, Melina G, Takkenberg JJ, Yacoub MH.
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2010 Jan 26; 55(4):368-76. PubMed ID: 20117443
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Aortic homograft: a suitable substitute for aortic valve replacement.
    Talwar S, Mohapatra R, Saxena A, Singh R, Kumar AS.
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2005 Sep 26; 80(3):832-8. PubMed ID: 16122437
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Pulmonary autograft versus aortic homograft for aortic valve replacement: interim results from a prospective randomized trial.
    Aklog L, Carr-White GS, Birks EJ, Yacoub MH.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2000 Mar 26; 9(2):176-88; discussion 188-9. PubMed ID: 10772034
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 21.