These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
144 related items for PubMed ID: 17728959
1. Moving into the digital era: a novel experience with the first full-field digital mammography system in Malaysia. Ranganathan S, Faridah Y, Ng KH. Singapore Med J; 2007 Sep; 48(9):804-7. PubMed ID: 17728959 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Breast cancer: missed interval and screening-detected cancer at full-field digital mammography and screen-film mammography-- results from a retrospective review. Hoff SR, Abrahamsen AL, Samset JH, Vigeland E, Klepp O, Hofvind S. Radiology; 2012 Aug; 264(2):378-86. PubMed ID: 22700555 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Randomized trial of screen-film versus full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading in population-based screening program: follow-up and final results of Oslo II study. Skaane P, Hofvind S, Skjennald A. Radiology; 2007 Sep; 244(3):708-17. PubMed ID: 17709826 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Follow-up and final results of the Oslo I Study comparing screen-film mammography and full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading. Skaane P, Skjennald A, Young K, Egge E, Jebsen I, Sager EM, Scheel B, Søvik E, Ertzaas AK, Hofvind S, Abdelnoor M. Acta Radiol; 2005 Nov; 46(7):679-89. PubMed ID: 16372686 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Screen-film mammography versus full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading: randomized trial in a population-based screening program--the Oslo II Study. Skaane P, Skjennald A. Radiology; 2004 Jul; 232(1):197-204. PubMed ID: 15155893 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of the transition from screen-film to digital screening mammography on interval cancer characteristics and treatment - a population based study from the Netherlands. Nederend J, Duijm LE, Louwman MW, Coebergh JW, Roumen RM, Lohle PN, Roukema JA, Rutten MJ, van Steenbergen LN, Ernst MF, Jansen FH, Plaisier ML, Hooijen MJ, Voogd AC. Eur J Cancer; 2014 Jan; 50(1):31-9. PubMed ID: 24275518 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Screening outcome in women repeatedly recalled for the same mammographic abnormality before, during and after the transition from screen-film to full-field digital screening mammography. van Bommel R, Voogd AC, Louwman MW, Strobbe LJ, Venderink D, Duijm LE. Eur Radiol; 2017 Feb; 27(2):553-561. PubMed ID: 27180183 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Mammographic performance in a population-based screening program: before, during, and after the transition from screen-film to full-field digital mammography. Hofvind S, Skaane P, Elmore JG, Sebuødegård S, Hoff SR, Lee CI. Radiology; 2014 Jul; 272(1):52-62. PubMed ID: 24689858 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Interval breast cancer characteristics before, during and after the transition from screen-film to full-field digital screening mammography. van Bommel RMG, Weber R, Voogd AC, Nederend J, Louwman MWJ, Venderink D, Strobbe LJA, Rutten MJC, Plaisier ML, Lohle PN, Hooijen MJH, Tjan-Heijnen VCG, Duijm LEM. BMC Cancer; 2017 May 05; 17(1):315. PubMed ID: 28476109 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Screen-film mammography versus full-field digital mammography in a population-based screening program: The Sogn and Fjordane study. Juel IM, Skaane P, Hoff SR, Johannessen G, Hofvind S. Acta Radiol; 2010 Nov 05; 51(9):962-8. PubMed ID: 20942729 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]