These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

226 related items for PubMed ID: 1774539

  • 1. Choice as a function of local versus molar reinforcement contingencies.
    Williams BA.
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1991 Nov; 56(3):455-73. PubMed ID: 1774539
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Dissociation of theories of choice by temporal spacing of choice opportunities.
    Williams BA.
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1992 Jul; 18(3):287-97. PubMed ID: 1619396
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Molar versus local reinforcement probability as determinants of stimulus value.
    Williams BA.
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1993 Jan; 59(1):163-72. PubMed ID: 8433063
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Memory and perseveration on a win-stay, lose-shift task in rats exposed neonatally to alcohol.
    Bell MC, Riley EP.
    J Stud Alcohol; 2006 Nov; 67(6):851-60. PubMed ID: 17061002
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Interval time-place learning by rats: varying reinforcement contingencies.
    Thorpe CM, Wilkie DM.
    Behav Processes; 2005 Sep 30; 70(2):156-67. PubMed ID: 16112509
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Effects of discrete-trial and free-operant procedures on the acquisition and maintenance of successive discrimination in rats.
    Hachiya S, Ito M.
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1991 Jan 30; 55(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 2002300
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Retention period differentially attenuates win-shift/lose-stay relative to win-stay/lose-shift performance in the rat.
    Reed P.
    Learn Behav; 2018 Mar 30; 46(1):60-66. PubMed ID: 28940120
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Duration of signals for intertrial reinforcement and nonreinforcement in random control procedures.
    Cooper LD, Aronson L, Balsam PD, Gibbon J.
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1990 Jan 30; 16(1):14-26. PubMed ID: 2303790
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Antecedent reinforcement contingencies in the stimulus control of an auditory discrimination.
    Pierrel R, Blue S.
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1967 Nov 30; 10(6):545-50. PubMed ID: 6080833
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. The Memory Trace Supporting Lose-Shift Responding Decays Rapidly after Reward Omission and Is Distinct from Other Learning Mechanisms in Rats.
    Gruber AJ, Thapa R.
    eNeuro; 2016 Nov 30; 3(6):. PubMed ID: 27896312
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Performance on ratio and interval schedules with matched reinforcement rates.
    Dawson GR, Dickinson A.
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 1990 Aug 30; 42(3):225-39. PubMed ID: 2236636
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 12.