These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

416 related items for PubMed ID: 17760889

  • 1. Seminal vesicle-sparing perineal radical prostatectomy improves early functional results in patients with low-risk prostate cancer.
    Albers P, Schäfers S, Löhmer H, de Geeter P.
    BJU Int; 2007 Nov; 100(5):1050-4. PubMed ID: 17760889
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Is seminal vesicle ablation mandatory for all patients undergoing radical prostatectomy? A multivariate analysis on 1283 patients.
    Zlotta AR, Roumeguère T, Ravery V, Hoffmann P, Montorsi F, Türkeri L, Dobrovrits M, Scattoni V, Ekane S, Bollens R, Vanden Bossche M, Djavan B, Boccon-Gibod L, Schulman CC, European Society for Urological Oncology.
    Eur Urol; 2004 Jul; 46(1):42-9. PubMed ID: 15183546
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. [Seminal vesicle sparing radical perineal prostatectomy].
    Schäfers S, de Geeter P, Löhmer H, Albers P.
    Urologe A; 2009 Apr; 48(4):408-14. PubMed ID: 19145427
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. [Stool behaviour and local pain after radical perineal and retroperitoneal prostatectomy].
    Mirzapour K, de Geeter P, Löhmer H, Albers P.
    Aktuelle Urol; 2011 Nov; 42(6):368-73. PubMed ID: 22090372
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Contemporary appraisal of radical perineal prostatectomy.
    Janoff DM, Parra RO.
    J Urol; 2005 Jun; 173(6):1863-70. PubMed ID: 15879765
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Radical retropubic vs. radical perineal prostatectomy: a comparison of relative benefits in four urban hospitals.
    May M, Dorst M, May J, Hoschke B, Fahlenkamp D, Vogler H, Siegsmund M.
    Urol Nurs; 2007 Dec; 27(6):519-26. PubMed ID: 18217535
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection, laparoscopically assisted seminal vesicle mobilization, and total perineal prostatectomy versus radical retropubic prostatectomy for prostate cancer.
    Teichman JM, Reddy PK, Hulbert JC.
    Urology; 1995 May; 45(5):823-30. PubMed ID: 7538244
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. A randomized clinical trial of suspension technique for improving early recovery of urinary continence after radical retropubic prostatectomy.
    Noguchi M, Kakuma T, Suekane S, Nakashima O, Mohamed ER, Matsuoka K.
    BJU Int; 2008 Sep; 102(8):958-63. PubMed ID: 18485031
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Re: Seminal vesicle-sparing perineal radical prostatectomy improves early functional results in patients with low-risk prostate cancer.
    Chabert C, Neill M, Eden C.
    BJU Int; 2008 Feb; 101(3):394. PubMed ID: 18184337
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Radical retropubic prostatectomy in men younger than 45 years diagnosed during early prostate cancer detection program.
    Varkarakis J, Pinggera GM, Sebe P, Berger A, Bartsch G, Horninger W.
    Urology; 2004 Feb; 63(2):337-41. PubMed ID: 14972485
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Clinical comparative evaluation of radical retropubic and perineal prostatectomy approaches for prostate cancer.
    Zuo W, Hiraoka Y.
    Hinyokika Kiyo; 2003 Jan; 49(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 12629774
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Single center comparison of anastomotic strictures after radical perineal and radical retropubic prostatectomy.
    Gillitzer R, Thomas C, Wiesner C, Jones J, Schmidt F, Hampel C, Brenner W, Thüroff JW, Melchior SW.
    Urology; 2010 Aug; 76(2):417-22. PubMed ID: 19969328
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Incidental prostate cancer at radical cystoprostatectomy: implications for apex-sparing surgery.
    Gakis G, Schilling D, Bedke J, Sievert KD, Stenzl A.
    BJU Int; 2010 Feb; 105(4):468-71. PubMed ID: 20102366
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Oncological and functional results of antegrade radical retropubic prostatectomy for the treatment of clinically localised prostate cancer.
    Carini M, Masieri L, Minervini A, Lapini A, Serni S.
    Eur Urol; 2008 Mar; 53(3):554-61. PubMed ID: 17683854
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Impact of prostate-specific antigen testing on the clinical and pathological outcomes after radical prostatectomy for Gleason 8-10 cancers.
    Boorjian SA, Karnes RJ, Rangel LJ, Bergstralh EJ, Frank I, Blute ML.
    BJU Int; 2008 Feb; 101(3):299-304. PubMed ID: 17922854
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Permanent 125I-seed brachytherapy or radical prostatectomy: a prospective comparison considering oncological and quality of life results.
    Borchers H, Kirschner-Hermanns R, Brehmer B, Tietze L, Reineke T, Pinkawa M, Eble MJ, Jakse G.
    BJU Int; 2004 Oct; 94(6):805-11. PubMed ID: 15476513
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. After radical retropubic prostatectomy 'insignificant' prostate cancer has a risk of progression similar to low-risk 'significant' cancer.
    Sengupta S, Blute ML, Bagniewski SM, Inman B, Leibovich BC, Slezak JM, Myers RP, Zincke H.
    BJU Int; 2008 Jan; 101(2):170-4. PubMed ID: 18173824
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Seminal monolateral nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy in selected patients.
    Bellina M, Mari M, Ambu A, Guercio S, Rolle L, Tampellini M.
    Urol Int; 2005 Jan; 75(2):175-80. PubMed ID: 16123574
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. The anatomic radical perineal prostatectomy: an outcomes-based evolution.
    Harris MJ.
    Eur Urol; 2007 Jul; 52(1):81-8. PubMed ID: 17084506
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 21.