These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

372 related items for PubMed ID: 17761214

  • 41. Waste collection systems for recyclables: an environmental and economic assessment for the municipality of Aarhus (Denmark).
    Larsen AW, Merrild H, Møller J, Christensen TH.
    Waste Manag; 2010 May; 30(5):744-54. PubMed ID: 19945262
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 42. Assessing the environmental burdens of anaerobic digestion in comparison to alternative options for managing the biodegradable fraction of municipal solid wastes.
    Haight M.
    Water Sci Technol; 2005 May; 52(1-2):553-9. PubMed ID: 16180477
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 43. The impact of landfilling and composting on greenhouse gas emissions--a review.
    Lou XF, Nair J.
    Bioresour Technol; 2009 Aug; 100(16):3792-8. PubMed ID: 19155172
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 44. Life-cycle assessment of selected management options for air pollution control residues from waste incineration.
    Fruergaard T, Hyks J, Astrup T.
    Sci Total Environ; 2010 Sep 15; 408(20):4672-80. PubMed ID: 20599249
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 45.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 46. Life-cycle assessment of municipal solid waste management alternatives with consideration of uncertainty: SIWMS development and application.
    Hanandeh AE, El-Zein A.
    Waste Manag; 2010 May 15; 30(5):902-11. PubMed ID: 20116992
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 47. Livestock waste treatment systems for environmental quality, food safety, and sustainability.
    Martinez J, Dabert P, Barrington S, Burton C.
    Bioresour Technol; 2009 Nov 15; 100(22):5527-36. PubMed ID: 19369065
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 48.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 49. Application of the US decision support tool for materials and waste management.
    Thorneloe SA, Weitz K, Jambeck J.
    Waste Manag; 2007 Nov 15; 27(8):1006-20. PubMed ID: 17433663
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 50. Life cycle assessment of EPS and CPB inserts: design considerations and end of life scenarios.
    Tan RB, Khoo HH.
    J Environ Manage; 2005 Feb 15; 74(3):195-205. PubMed ID: 15644260
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 51.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 52. Waste battery treatment options: comparing their environmental performance.
    Briffaerts K, Spirinckx C, Van der Linden A, Vrancken K.
    Waste Manag; 2009 Aug 15; 29(8):2321-31. PubMed ID: 19386482
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 53.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 54. A novel model of organic waste composting in Taiwan military community.
    Tai HS, He WH.
    Waste Manag; 2007 Aug 15; 27(5):664-74. PubMed ID: 16730968
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 55.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 56. Comparative environmental assessment of natural and recycled aggregate concrete.
    Marinković S, Radonjanin V, Malešev M, Ignjatović I.
    Waste Manag; 2010 Nov 15; 30(11):2255-64. PubMed ID: 20434898
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 57. Environmental and economic analysis of an in-vessel food waste composting system at Kean University in the U.S.
    Mu D, Horowitz N, Casey M, Jones K.
    Waste Manag; 2017 Jan 15; 59():476-486. PubMed ID: 27816469
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 58. What is the most environmentally beneficial way to treat commercial food waste?
    Levis JW, Barlaz MA.
    Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Sep 01; 45(17):7438-44. PubMed ID: 21838255
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 59.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 60.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 19.