These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

1099 related items for PubMed ID: 17766600

  • 1. Transcervical Foley catheter with and without extraamniotic saline infusion for labor induction: a randomized controlled trial.
    Lin MG, Reid KJ, Treaster MR, Nuthalapaty FS, Ramsey PS, Lu GC.
    Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Sep; 110(3):558-65. PubMed ID: 17766600
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Labor induction in women with an unfavorable Bishop score: randomized controlled trial of intrauterine Foley catheter with concurrent oxytocin infusion versus Foley catheter with extra-amniotic saline infusion with concurrent oxytocin infusion.
    Guinn DA, Davies JK, Jones RO, Sullivan L, Wolf D.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jul; 191(1):225-9. PubMed ID: 15295370
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Induction of labor using a foley balloon, with and without extra-amniotic saline infusion.
    Karjane NW, Brock EL, Walsh SW.
    Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Feb; 107(2 Pt 1):234-9. PubMed ID: 16449106
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Extraamniotic saline infusion is promising in preparing the cervix for induction of labor.
    Hemlin J, Möller B.
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1998 Jan; 77(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 9492717
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Evaluation of the effect of extra-amniotic normal saline infusion alone or in combination with dexamethasone for the induction of labor.
    Kashanian M, Fekrat M, Naghghash S, Ansari NS.
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2008 Feb; 34(1):47-50. PubMed ID: 18226128
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Pre-induction cervical ripening: transcervical foley catheter versus intravaginal misoprostol.
    Adeniji OA, Oladokun A, Olayemi O, Adeniji OI, Odukogbe AA, Ogunbode O, Aimakhu CO, Omigbodun AO, Ilesanmi AO.
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2005 Feb; 25(2):134-9. PubMed ID: 15814391
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Cervical ripening with transcervical foley catheter and the risk of uterine rupture.
    Bujold E, Blackwell SC, Gauthier RJ.
    Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jan; 103(1):18-23. PubMed ID: 14704239
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Preinduction cervical ripening techniques compared.
    Greybush M, Singleton C, Atlas RO, Balducci J, Rust OA.
    J Reprod Med; 2001 Jan; 46(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 11209625
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Unsucessful labour induction in women with unfavourable cervical scores: predictors and management.
    Caliskan E, Dilbaz S, Gelisen O, Dilbaz B, Ozturk N, Haberal A.
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2004 Dec; 44(6):562-7. PubMed ID: 15598298
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 55.