These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

1041 related items for PubMed ID: 17805018

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Muscle function and functional outcome following standard antegrade reamed intramedullary nailing of isolated femoral shaft fractures.
    Helmy N, Jando VT, Lu T, Chan H, O'Brien PJ.
    J Orthop Trauma; 2008 Jan; 22(1):10-5. PubMed ID: 18176159
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Comparison of knee function after antegrade and retrograde intramedullary nailing for diaphyseal femoral fractures: results of isokinetic evaluation.
    Daglar B, Gungor E, Delialioglu OM, Karakus D, Ersoz M, Tasbas BA, Bayrakci K, Gunel U.
    J Orthop Trauma; 2009 Oct; 23(9):640-4. PubMed ID: 19897985
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Antegrade nailing of femoral shaft fractures combined with neck or distal femur fractures. A retrospective review of 25 cases, with a follow-up of 36-150 months.
    Okcu G, Aktuglu K.
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2003 Dec; 123(10):544-50. PubMed ID: 13680274
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. The outcome of closed, intramedullary exchange nailing with reamed insertion in the treatment of femoral shaft nonunions.
    Shroeder JE, Mosheiff R, Khoury A, Liebergall M, Weil YA.
    J Orthop Trauma; 2009 Oct; 23(9):653-7. PubMed ID: 19897987
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. A prospective functional outcome and motion analysis evaluation of the hip abductors after femur fracture and antegrade nailing.
    Archdeacon M, Ford KR, Wyrick J, Paterno MV, Hampton S, Ludwig MB, Hewett TE.
    J Orthop Trauma; 2008 Jan; 22(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 18176158
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. How comparable is so-called standard fracture fixation with an identical implant? A prospective experience with the antegrade femoral nail in South Africa and Europe.
    Gross T, Huettl T, Audigé L, Frey C, Monesi M, Seibert FJ, Messmer P.
    Injury; 2010 Apr; 41(4):388-95. PubMed ID: 19900673
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Comparison study between reamed and unreamed nailing of closed femoral fractures.
    Selvakumar K, Saw KY, Fathima M.
    Med J Malaysia; 2001 Dec; 56 Suppl D():24-8. PubMed ID: 14569762
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Retrograde versus antegrade nailing of femoral shaft fractures.
    Ricci WM, Bellabarba C, Evanoff B, Herscovici D, DiPasquale T, Sanders R.
    J Orthop Trauma; 2001 Dec; 15(3):161-9. PubMed ID: 11265005
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. [Comparative study of antegrade and retrograde intramedullary nailing for the treatment of humeral shaft fractures].
    Li WY, Zhang BS, Zhang L, Zheng SH, Wang Sm.
    Zhongguo Gu Shang; 2009 Mar; 22(3):199-201. PubMed ID: 19366103
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Limb malalignment and functional outcome after antegrade versus retrograde intramedullary nailing in distal femoral fractures.
    Salem KH, Maier D, Keppler P, Kinzl L, Gebhard F.
    J Trauma; 2006 Aug; 61(2):375-81. PubMed ID: 16917453
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Factors affecting the results of distal femoral fractures treated by retrograde intramedullary nailing.
    Kim JW, Oh CW, Kyung HS, Min WK, Yoon SH.
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2009 Nov; 23(11):1311-5. PubMed ID: 19968169
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. [Comparison of the results of the treatment of humeral shaft fractures with antegrade locked intramedullary nailing and retrograde locked intramedullary nailing].
    Liu XH, Sun L, Jiang XY, Wang MY, Zhang LD.
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2007 Apr 03; 87(13):902-5. PubMed ID: 17650402
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Avoidance of malreduction of proximal femoral shaft fractures with the use of a minimally invasive nail insertion technique (MINIT).
    Russell TA, Mir HR, Stoneback J, Cohen J, Downs B.
    J Orthop Trauma; 2008 Jul 03; 22(6):391-8. PubMed ID: 18594303
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Retrograde femoral nailing and knee function.
    Murray P, Bergin P, Labropoulos P, Gunther S.
    Orthopedics; 2008 Oct 03; 31(10):. PubMed ID: 19226019
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Comparison of knee function in patients with a healed fracture of the femoral shaft fixed with retrograde and antegrade intramedullary nailing.
    Andrzejewski K, Panasiuk M, Grzegorzewski A, Synder M.
    Ortop Traumatol Rehabil; 2013 Oct 31; 15(5):395-405. PubMed ID: 24431251
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Exchange nailing for aseptic nonunion of femoral shaft: a retrospective cohort study for effect of reaming size.
    Wu CC.
    J Trauma; 2007 Oct 31; 63(4):859-65. PubMed ID: 18090018
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Prospective randomized comparative study of antegrade and retrograde locked nailing for middle humeral shaft fracture.
    Cheng HR, Lin J.
    J Trauma; 2008 Jul 31; 65(1):94-102. PubMed ID: 18580523
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. The incidence of non-union following unreamed intramedullary nailing of femoral shaft fractures.
    el Moumni M, Leenhouts PA, ten Duis HJ, Wendt KW.
    Injury; 2009 Feb 31; 40(2):205-8. PubMed ID: 19070840
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 53.