These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

315 related items for PubMed ID: 17845326

  • 1. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia II-III with endocervical cone margin involvement after cervical loop conization: is there any predictor for residual disease?
    Kietpeerakool C, Khunamornpong S, Srisomboon J, Siriaunkgul S, Suprasert P.
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2007 Oct; 33(5):660-4. PubMed ID: 17845326
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. [Clinical outcome and high risk factor for residual lesion analysis of HSIL half a year after loop electrosurgical excision procedure: a clinical study of 1 502 cases].
    Liu L, Chen LM, Tao X, Dai F, Guo LP, Zhang HW, Zhou XR, Sui L.
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Nov 25; 52(11):751-756. PubMed ID: 29179270
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. High-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion with endocervical cone margin involvement after cervical loop electrosurgical excision: what should a clinician do?
    Siriaree S, Srisomboon J, Kietpeerakool C, Khunamornpong S, Siriaunkgul S, Natpratan A, Pratheapjarus S, Futemwong A, Chantarasenawong U.
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2006 Nov 25; 7(3):463-6. PubMed ID: 17059346
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Predictors of recurrent dysplasia after a cervical loop electrocautery excision procedure for CIN-3: a study of margin, endocervical gland, and quadrant involvement.
    Livasy CA, Maygarden SJ, Rajaratnam CT, Novotny DB.
    Mod Pathol; 1999 Mar 25; 12(3):233-8. PubMed ID: 10102607
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Outcome after conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade III: relation with surgical margins, extension to the crypts and mitoses.
    Maluf PJ, Adad SJ, Murta EF.
    Tumori; 2004 Mar 25; 90(5):473-7. PubMed ID: 15656332
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Predictive factors for residual disease in hysterectomy specimens after conization in early-stage cervical cancer.
    Wong AS, Li WH, Cheung TH.
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Apr 25; 199():21-6. PubMed ID: 26894378
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. [Relationship between various histological status of margins of LEEP and residual HSIL or worse at hysterectomy following conization].
    Xiao YP, Tao X, Zhao CY, Qu YQ, Xie F, Ning Y.
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Jan 25; 54(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 30695901
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Dysplastic endocervical curettings: a predictor of cervical squamous cell carcinoma.
    Temkin SM, Hellmann M, Lee YC, Abulafia O.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2007 May 25; 196(5):469.e1-4. PubMed ID: 17466706
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Residual lesions in uterine specimens after loop electrosurgical excision procedure in patients with CIN.
    Jing L, Dan W, Zhunan L, Ying X, Yi C.
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2018 Oct 25; 298(4):805-812. PubMed ID: 30167855
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Repeat LEEP conization in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 and positive ectocervical margins.
    Ayhan A, Boynukalin FK, Guven S, Dogan NU, Esinler I, Usubutun A.
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2009 Apr 25; 105(1):14-7. PubMed ID: 19111301
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Predictive factors from cold knife conization for residual cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in subsequent hysterectomy.
    Moore BC, Higgins RV, Laurent SL, Marroum MC, Bellitt P.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Aug 25; 173(2):361-6; discussion 366-8. PubMed ID: 7645609
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. [LEEP versus cold knife conization for treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasias].
    Hillemanns P, Kimmig R, Dannecker C, Noorzai T, Diebold J, Thaler CJ, Hepp H.
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 2000 Aug 25; 122(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 10785949
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Photodynamic therapy for management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia II and III in young patients and obstetric outcomes.
    Choi MC, Jung SG, Park H, Lee SY, Lee C, Hwang YY, Kim SJ.
    Lasers Surg Med; 2013 Nov 25; 45(9):564-72. PubMed ID: 24136239
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Can we predict surgical margin positivity while performing cervical excisional procedures?
    Durmuş Y, Karalök A, Başaran D, Kamani MO, Boran N, Koç S, Turan AT.
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2020 Jul 25; 40(5):666-672. PubMed ID: 31482755
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Predictors of recurrent/residual disease after loop electrosurgical excisional procedure.
    Chikazawa K, Netsu S, Motomatsu S, Konno R.
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2016 Apr 25; 42(4):457-63. PubMed ID: 26786387
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Predictive factors used to justify hysterectomy after loop conization: increasing age and severity of disease.
    Kalogirou D, Antoniou G, Karakitsos P, Botsis D, Kalogirou O, Giannikos L.
    Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 1997 Apr 25; 18(2):113-6. PubMed ID: 9105859
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 16.