These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
463 related items for PubMed ID: 17870221
1. Factors affecting hip range of motion in surface replacement arthroplasty. Vendittoli PA, Ganapathi M, Nuño N, Plamondon D, Lavigne M. Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2007 Nov; 22(9):1004-12. PubMed ID: 17870221 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Analysis of optimal range of socket orientations in total hip arthroplasty with use of computer-aided design simulation. Seki M, Yuasa N, Ohkuni K. J Orthop Res; 1998 Jul; 16(4):513-7. PubMed ID: 9747795 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Femoral head to neck offset after hip resurfacing is critical for range of motion. Girard J, Krantz N, Bocquet D, Wavreille G, Migaud H. Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2012 Feb; 27(2):165-9. PubMed ID: 21925779 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The impact of the CCD-angle on range of motion and cup positioning in total hip arthroplasty. Widmer KH, Majewski M. Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2005 Aug; 20(7):723-8. PubMed ID: 15964112 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Limited range of motion of hip resurfacing arthroplasty due to unfavorable ratio of prosthetic head size and femoral neck diameter. Kluess D, Zietz C, Lindner T, Mittelmeier W, Schmitz KP, Bader R. Acta Orthop; 2008 Dec; 79(6):748-54. PubMed ID: 19085490 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Bony impingement affects range of motion after total hip arthroplasty: A subject-specific approach. Kessler O, Patil S, Wirth S, Mayr E, Colwell CW, D'Lima DD. J Orthop Res; 2008 Apr; 26(4):443-52. PubMed ID: 18050356 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Painful impingement of the hip joint after total hip resurfacing: a report of two cases. Lavigne M, Rama KR, Roy A, Vendittoli PA. J Arthroplasty; 2008 Oct; 23(7):1074-9. PubMed ID: 18534499 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of the femoral offset and the head size on the safe range of motion in total hip arthroplasty. Matsushita A, Nakashima Y, Jingushi S, Yamamoto T, Kuraoka A, Iwamoto Y. J Arthroplasty; 2009 Jun; 24(4):646-51. PubMed ID: 18534445 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of acetabular component anteversion on dislocation mechanisms in total hip arthroplasty. Higa M, Tanino H, Abo M, Kakunai S, Banks SA. J Biomech; 2011 Jun 03; 44(9):1810-3. PubMed ID: 21529811 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Biomechanics of large femoral heads: what they do and don't do. Crowninshield RD, Maloney WJ, Wentz DH, Humphrey SM, Blanchard CR. Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2004 Dec 03; (429):102-7. PubMed ID: 15577473 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Method for the evaluation of factors influencing the dislocation stability of total hip endoprotheses]. Bader R, Scholz R, Steinhauser E, Busch R, Mittelmeier W. Biomed Tech (Berl); 2004 May 03; 49(5):137-44. PubMed ID: 15212199 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Impingement after total hip arthroplasty related to prosthetic component selection and range of motion. Gondi G, Roberson JR, Ganey TM, Shahriari A, Hutton WC. J South Orthop Assoc; 1997 May 03; 6(4):266-72. PubMed ID: 9434247 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Guidelines for implant placement to minimize impingement during activities of daily living after total hip arthroplasty. Patel AB, Wagle RR, Usrey MM, Thompson MT, Incavo SJ, Noble PC. J Arthroplasty; 2010 Dec 03; 25(8):1275-81.e1. PubMed ID: 20022449 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]