These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

262 related items for PubMed ID: 17877596

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Transvaginal sonographic measurement of cervical length vs. Bishop score in labor induction at term: tolerability and prediction of Cesarean delivery.
    Tan PC, Vallikkannu N, Suguna S, Quek KF, Hassan J.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2007 May; 29(5):568-73. PubMed ID: 17444553
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Bishop score and ultrasound assessment of the cervix for prediction of time to onset of labor and time to delivery in prolonged pregnancy.
    Strobel E, Sladkevicius P, Rovas L, De Smet F, Karlsson ED, Valentin L.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Sep; 28(3):298-305. PubMed ID: 16817173
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Comparison between subjective and objective assessments of the cervix before induction of labour.
    Elghorori MR, Hassan I, Dartey W, Abdel-Aziz E, Bradley M.
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2006 Aug; 26(6):521-6. PubMed ID: 17000497
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Comparison of ultrasonographic cervical length and the Bishop score in predicting successful labor induction.
    Gómez Laencina AM, Sánchez FG, Gimenez JH, Martínez MS, Valverde Martínez JA, Vizcaíno VM.
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2007 Aug; 86(7):799-804. PubMed ID: 17611824
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Transvaginal ultrasonographic cervical measurement in predicting failed labor induction and cesarean delivery for failure to progress in nulliparous women.
    Park KH.
    J Korean Med Sci; 2007 Aug; 22(4):722-7. PubMed ID: 17728517
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Sonographic cervical length as a predictor of type of delivery after induced labor.
    Gómez-Laencina AM, García CP, Asensio LV, Ponce JA, Martínez MS, Martínez-Vizcaíno V.
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Jun; 285(6):1523-8. PubMed ID: 22198844
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Degree of cervical shortening after initial induction of labor as a predictor of subsequent successful induction.
    Kang WS, Park KH, Kim SN, Shin DM, Hong JS, Jung HJ.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Dec; 36(6):749-54. PubMed ID: 20205152
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Comparison of digital and ultrasonographic examination of the cervix in predicting time interval from induction to delivery in women with a low Bishop score.
    Rozenberg P, Chevret S, Chastang C, Ville Y.
    BJOG; 2005 Feb; 112(2):192-6. PubMed ID: 15663583
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Transvaginal ultrasound measurement of cervical length in the supine and upright positions versus Bishop score in predicting successful induction of labor at term.
    Meijer-Hoogeveen M, Roos C, Arabin B, Stoutenbeek P, Visser GH.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Feb; 33(2):213-20. PubMed ID: 19173229
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 14.