These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. A nonradiographic approach to detect Class III skeletal discrepancies. Staudt CB, Kiliaridis S. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 19577148 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Craniofacial profile in Southern Chinese with hypodontia. Chan DW, Samman N, McMillan AS. Eur J Orthod; 2009 Jun; 31(3):300-5. PubMed ID: 19193707 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Soft and hard tissue changes after bimaxillary surgery in Turkish female Class III patients. Marşan G, Cura N, Emekli U. J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2009 Jan; 37(1):8-17. PubMed ID: 18786833 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Uvulo-glosso-pharyngeal dimensions in different anteroposterior skeletal patterns. Abu Allhaija ES, Al-Khateeb SN. Angle Orthod; 2005 Nov; 75(6):1012-8. PubMed ID: 16448247 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Soft and hard tissue profile changes after rapid maxillary expansion and face mask therapy. Kurt G, Uysal T, Yagci A. World J Orthod; 2010 Nov; 11(4):e10-8. PubMed ID: 21490978 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Glossoplasty: hope and pre-orthodontic support?]. Raberin M, Busson E. Orthod Fr; 1992 Nov; 63 Pt 2():455-68. PubMed ID: 1341732 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Airway volume for different dentofacial skeletal patterns. El H, Palomo JM. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Jun; 139(6):e511-21. PubMed ID: 21640863 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Orthodontists' and laypersons' aesthetic assessment of Class III subjects referred for orthognathic surgery. Fabré M, Mossaz C, Christou P, Kiliaridis S. Eur J Orthod; 2009 Aug; 31(4):443-8. PubMed ID: 19395371 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Soft tissue facial morphometry in subjects with Moebius syndrome. Sforza C, Grandi G, Pisoni L, Di Blasio C, Gandolfini M, Ferrario VF. Eur J Oral Sci; 2009 Dec; 117(6):695-703. PubMed ID: 20121933 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Asymmetry of the face in orthodontic patients. Haraguchi S, Iguchi Y, Takada K. Angle Orthod; 2008 May; 78(3):421-6. PubMed ID: 18416611 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. An evaluation of the Pi analysis in the assessment of anteroposterior jaw relationship. Kumar S, Valiathan A, Gautam P, Chakravarthy K, Jayaswal P. J Orthod; 2012 Dec; 39(4):262-9. PubMed ID: 23269690 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Variation in dentofacial morphology and occlusion in juvenile idiopathic arthritis subjects: a case-control study. Hu Y, Billiau AD, Verdonck A, Wouters C, Carels C. Eur J Orthod; 2009 Feb; 31(1):51-8. PubMed ID: 19164412 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Use of the centroid method of occlusion for studying the vertical and horizontal relationship of the mandible and maxilla. Murata S. Eur J Orthod; 2007 Dec; 29(6):600-4. PubMed ID: 17873144 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. An investigation into the relationship between the cranial base angle and malocclusion. Dhopatkar A, Bhatia S, Rock P. Angle Orthod; 2002 Oct; 72(5):456-63. PubMed ID: 12401055 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Compensation for vertical dysplasia and its clinical application. Anwar N, Fida M. Eur J Orthod; 2009 Oct; 31(5):516-22. PubMed ID: 19679646 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]