These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

307 related items for PubMed ID: 17888169

  • 1. Comparison of culture, ELISA and PCR techniques for salmonella detection in faecal samples for cattle, pig and poultry.
    Eriksson E, Aspan A.
    BMC Vet Res; 2007 Sep 22; 3():21. PubMed ID: 17888169
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Impact of invA-PCR and culture detection methods on occurrence and survival of salmonella in the flesh, internal organs and lymphoid tissues of experimentally infected pigs.
    Arnold T, Scholz HC, Marg H, Rösler U, Hensel A.
    J Vet Med B Infect Dis Vet Public Health; 2004 Dec 22; 51(10):459-63. PubMed ID: 15606871
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Validation of a 20-h real-time PCR method for screening of Salmonella in poultry faecal samples.
    Löfström C, Hansen F, Hoorfar J.
    Vet Microbiol; 2010 Aug 26; 144(3-4):511-4. PubMed ID: 20207510
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Growth inhibitory factors in bovine faeces impairs detection of Salmonella Dublin by conventional culture procedure.
    Baggesen DL, Nielsen LR, Sørensen G, Bødker R, Ersbøll AK.
    J Appl Microbiol; 2007 Sep 26; 103(3):650-6. PubMed ID: 17714398
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. The effect of pre-enrichment protocol on the sensitivity and specificity of PCR for detection of naturally contaminated Salmonella in raw poultry compared to conventional culture.
    Myint MS, Johnson YJ, Tablante NL, Heckert RA.
    Food Microbiol; 2006 Sep 26; 23(6):599-604. PubMed ID: 16943057
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. [Combination of direct-ELISA and PCR for the rapid detection and identification of Salmonella spp].
    Huang JL, Jiao XA, Pan ZM, Wen QY, Sun L, Liu XF.
    Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2004 Sep 26; 38(5):331-4. PubMed ID: 15498250
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Salmonella contamination in pigs at slaughter and on the farm: a field study using an antibody ELISA test and a PCR technique.
    Nowak B, von Müffling T, Chaunchom S, Hartung J.
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2007 Apr 20; 115(3):259-67. PubMed ID: 17292500
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Salmonella detection in poultry samples. Comparison of two commercial real-time PCR systems with culture methods for the detection of Salmonella spp. in environmental and fecal samples of poultry.
    Sommer D, Enderlein D, Antakli A, Schönenbrücher H, Slaghuis J, Redmann T, Lierz M.
    Tierarztl Prax Ausg G Grosstiere Nutztiere; 2012 Apr 20; 40(6):383-9. PubMed ID: 23242148
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 16.