These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


321 related items for PubMed ID: 17893053

  • 1. Liver MR imaging: 1.5T versus 3T.
    Ramalho M, Altun E, Herédia V, Zapparoli M, Semelka R.
    Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 2007 Aug; 15(3):321-47, vi. PubMed ID: 17893053
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. MR colonography: 1.5T versus 3T.
    Lauenstein TC, Saar B, Martin DR.
    Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 2007 Aug; 15(3):395-402, vii. PubMed ID: 17893059
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. 3.0-T MRI evaluation of patients with chronic liver diseases: initial observations.
    Zapparoli M, Semelka RC, Altun E, Tsurusaki M, Pamuklar E, Dale BM, Gasparetto EL, Elias J.
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Jun; 26(5):650-60. PubMed ID: 18440749
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. MR imaging of the liver. Technique.
    Soyer P, Bluemke DA, Rymer R.
    Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 1997 May; 5(2):205-21. PubMed ID: 9113672
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Abdominal MR imaging at 3T.
    Merkle EM, Dale BM, Paulson EK.
    Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 2006 Feb; 14(1):17-26. PubMed ID: 16530632
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Hepatic MR imaging techniques, optimization, and artifacts.
    Guglielmo FF, Mitchell DG, Roth CG, Deshmukh S.
    Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 2014 Aug; 22(3):263-82. PubMed ID: 25086929
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. MR imaging of the adrenal glands: 1.5T versus 3T.
    Merkle EM, Schindera ST.
    Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 2007 Aug; 15(3):365-72, vii. PubMed ID: 17893056
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. A review of MR physics: 3T versus 1.5T.
    Soher BJ, Dale BM, Merkle EM.
    Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 2007 Aug; 15(3):277-90, v. PubMed ID: 17893049
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Kidneys and MR urography.
    Leyendecker JR, Childs DD.
    Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 2007 Aug; 15(3):373-82, vii. PubMed ID: 17893057
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Small bowel MR imaging: 1.5T versus 3T.
    Patak MA, von Weymarn C, Froehlich JM.
    Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 2007 Aug; 15(3):383-93, vii. PubMed ID: 17893058
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. MR cholangiopancreatography: 1.5T versus 3T.
    Schindera ST, Merkle EM.
    Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 2007 Aug; 15(3):355-64, vi-vii. PubMed ID: 17893055
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. MR imaging of the spine at 3T.
    Shapiro MD.
    Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 2006 Feb; 14(1):97-108. PubMed ID: 16530638
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. MR imaging of the pancreas: 1.5T versus 3T.
    Edelman RR.
    Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 2007 Aug; 15(3):349-53, vi. PubMed ID: 17893054
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Functional renal imaging: nonvascular renal disease.
    Michaely HJ, Herrmann KA, Nael K, Oesingmann N, Reiser MF, Schoenberg SO.
    Abdom Imaging; 2007 Aug; 32(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 16447077
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Approach to abdominal imaging at 1.5 Tesla and optimization at 3 Tesla.
    Martin DR, Friel HT, Danrad R, De Becker J, Hussain SM.
    Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 2005 May; 13(2):241-54, v-vi. PubMed ID: 15935310
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Novel contrast mechanisms at high field 1.
    Börnert P, Bieri O, Scheffler K.
    Semin Musculoskelet Radiol; 2008 Sep; 12(3):253-65. PubMed ID: 18850505
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. MR imaging of the chest: a practical approach at 1.5T.
    Puderbach M, Hintze C, Ley S, Eichinger M, Kauczor HU, Biederer J.
    Eur J Radiol; 2007 Dec; 64(3):345-55. PubMed ID: 17900843
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. [Clinical applications of 3.0 T magnetic resonance system in the neuroradiological field].
    Matsusue E, Ogawa T.
    Brain Nerve; 2007 May; 59(5):479-85. PubMed ID: 17533973
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Comparison of respiratory-triggered T2-weighted turbo spin-echo imaging versus breath-hold T2-weighted turbo spin-echo imaging: distinguishing benign from malignant liver lesions in patients with colorectal cancer.
    Coenegrachts K, ter Beek L, Haspeslagh M, Bipat S, Stoker J, Rigauts H.
    JBR-BTR; 2009 May; 92(4):195-201. PubMed ID: 19803097
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. MR imaging techniques for pancreas.
    Tirkes T, Menias CO, Sandrasegaran K.
    Radiol Clin North Am; 2012 May; 50(3):379-93. PubMed ID: 22560687
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 17.