These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

183 related items for PubMed ID: 17894576

  • 1. A comparison between QLAB and TomTec full volume reconstruction for real time three-dimensional echocardiographic quantification of left ventricular volumes.
    Soliman OI, Krenning BJ, Geleijnse ML, Nemes A, van Geuns RJ, Baks T, Anwar AM, Galema TW, Vletter WB, ten Cate FJ.
    Echocardiography; 2007 Oct; 24(9):967-74. PubMed ID: 17894576
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Evaluation of Left Ventricular Volumes and Function by Real Time Three-Dimensional Echocardiography in Children with Functional Single Left Ventricle: A Comparison between QLAB and TomTec.
    Zhong SW, Zhang YQ, Chen LJ, Wang SS, Li WH.
    Echocardiography; 2015 Oct; 32(10):1554-63. PubMed ID: 26099327
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Assessment of left ventricular volumes and function by real time three-dimensional echocardiography in a pediatric population: a TomTec versus QLAB comparison.
    Hascoët S, Brierre G, Caudron G, Cardin C, Bongard V, Acar P.
    Echocardiography; 2010 Nov; 27(10):1263-73. PubMed ID: 20584067
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Quantification of left ventricular volumes and function in anesthetized beagles using real-time three-dimensional echocardiography: 4D-TomTec™ analysis versus 4D-AutLVQ™ analysis in comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.
    Eskofier J, Wefstaedt P, Beyerbach M, Nolte I, Hungerbühler SO.
    BMC Vet Res; 2015 Oct 12; 11():260. PubMed ID: 26459280
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Quantitative assessment of left ventricular volume and ejection fraction using two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography.
    Nishikage T, Nakai H, Mor-Avi V, Lang RM, Salgo IS, Settlemier SH, Husson S, Takeuchi M.
    Eur J Echocardiogr; 2009 Jan 12; 10(1):82-8. PubMed ID: 18490270
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Semi-automated quantification of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction by real-time three-dimensional echocardiography.
    Hansegård J, Urheim S, Lunde K, Malm S, Rabben SI.
    Cardiovasc Ultrasound; 2009 Apr 20; 7():18. PubMed ID: 19379479
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Real-Time Three-Dimensional Echocardiography of the Left Ventricle-Pediatric Percentiles and Head-to-Head Comparison of Different Contour-Finding Algorithms: A Multicenter Study.
    Krell K, Laser KT, Dalla-Pozza R, Winkler C, Hildebrandt U, Kececioglu D, Breuer J, Herberg U.
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2018 Jun 20; 31(6):702-711.e13. PubMed ID: 29605473
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Rapid online quantification of left ventricular volume from real-time three-dimensional echocardiographic data.
    Jacobs LD, Salgo IS, Goonewardena S, Weinert L, Coon P, Bardo D, Gerard O, Allain P, Zamorano JL, de Isla LP, Mor-Avi V, Lang RM.
    Eur Heart J; 2006 Feb 20; 27(4):460-8. PubMed ID: 16319085
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Comparison of contrast agent-enhanced versus non-contrast agent-enhanced real-time three-dimensional echocardiography for analysis of left ventricular systolic function.
    Krenning BJ, Kirschbaum SW, Soliman OI, Nemes A, van Geuns RJ, Vletter WB, Veltman CE, Ten Cate FJ, Roelandt JR, Geleijnse ML.
    Am J Cardiol; 2007 Nov 01; 100(9):1485-9. PubMed ID: 17950813
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Real-time simultaneous triplane contrast echocardiography gives rapid, accurate, and reproducible assessment of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction: a comparison with magnetic resonance imaging.
    Malm S, Frigstad S, Sagberg E, Steen PA, Skjarpe T.
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2006 Dec 01; 19(12):1494-501. PubMed ID: 17138035
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. New generation 3-dimensional echocardiography for left ventricular volumetric and functional measurements: comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance.
    Nikitin NP, Constantin C, Loh PH, Ghosh J, Lukaschuk EI, Bennett A, Hurren S, Alamgir F, Clark AL, Cleland JG.
    Eur J Echocardiogr; 2006 Oct 01; 7(5):365-72. PubMed ID: 16916621
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Knowledge-based reconstruction of right ventricular volumes using real-time three-dimensional echocardiographic as well as cardiac magnetic resonance images: comparison with a cardiac magnetic resonance standard.
    Laser KT, Horst JP, Barth P, Kelter-Klöpping A, Haas NA, Burchert W, Kececioglu D, Körperich H.
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2014 Oct 01; 27(10):1087-97. PubMed ID: 24969839
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Real-time three-dimensional echocardiographic acquisition and quantification of left ventricular indices in children and young adults with congenital heart disease: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging.
    Riehle TJ, Mahle WT, Parks WJ, Sallee D, Fyfe DA.
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2008 Jan 01; 21(1):78-83. PubMed ID: 17628400
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.