These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

329 related items for PubMed ID: 17902334

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. A randomized clinical trial of thermoplastic retainer wear.
    Thickett E, Power S.
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Feb; 32(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 19828592
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Removable thermoplastic appliances as orthodontic retainers--a prospective study of different wear regimens.
    Jäderberg S, Feldmann I, Engström C.
    Eur J Orthod; 2012 Aug; 34(4):475-9. PubMed ID: 21508267
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Evaluation of orthodontic treatment after 1 year of retention--a randomized controlled trial.
    Edman Tynelius G, Bondemark L, Lilja-Karlander E.
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Oct; 32(5):542-7. PubMed ID: 20080961
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Effectiveness of bonded and vacuum-formed retainers: A prospective randomized controlled clinical trial.
    O'Rourke N, Albeedh H, Sharma P, Johal A.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Sep; 150(3):406-15. PubMed ID: 27585768
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. The effectiveness of Hawley and vacuum-formed retainers: a single-center randomized controlled trial.
    Rowland H, Hichens L, Williams A, Hills D, Killingback N, Ewings P, Clark S, Ireland AJ, Sandy JR.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Dec; 132(6):730-7. PubMed ID: 18068589
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Anterior tooth wear and retention type until 5 years after orthodontic treatment.
    Kuijpers MA, Kiliaridis S, Renkema A, Bronkhorst EM, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM.
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2009 Dec; 67(3):176-81. PubMed ID: 19247853
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Results of a survey-based study to identify common retention practices in the United States.
    Valiathan M, Hughes E.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Feb; 137(2):170-7; discussion 177. PubMed ID: 20152670
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. [Clinical evaluation of lingual fixed retainer combined with Hawley retainer and vacuum-formed retainer].
    Xu XC, Li RM, Tang GH.
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2011 Dec; 20(6):623-6. PubMed ID: 22241313
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Prospective clinical trial comparing the effects of conventional Twin-block and mini-block appliances: Part 1. Hard tissue changes.
    Gill DS, Lee RT.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Apr; 127(4):465-72; quiz 517. PubMed ID: 15821691
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Effectiveness of lingual retainers bonded to the canines in preventing mandibular incisor relapse.
    Renkema AM, Al-Assad S, Bronkhorst E, Weindel S, Katsaros C, Lisson JA.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Aug; 134(2):179e1-8. PubMed ID: 18675196
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 17.