These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

202 related items for PubMed ID: 17905538

  • 1. [Comparison of phenotypic methods with PCR to screening methicillin resistance in coagulase negative staphylococci].
    Majouri D, Touati A, Achour W, Bouchami O, Ben Hassen A.
    Pathol Biol (Paris); 2007 Nov; 55(8-9):361-5. PubMed ID: 17905538
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Laboratory detection methods for methicillin resistance in coagulase negative Staphylococcus isolated from ophthalmic infections.
    Oliveira AD, d'Azevedo PA, de Sousa LB, Viana-Niero C, Francisco W, Lottenberg C, Martino MD, Höfling-Lima AL.
    Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2007 Nov; 70(4):667-75. PubMed ID: 17906764
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Comparison of phenotypic versus genotypic methods in the detection of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus.
    Mohanasoundaram KM, Lalitha MK.
    Indian J Med Res; 2008 Jan; 127(1):78-84. PubMed ID: 18316857
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Genotypic versus phenotypic characterization, with respect to susceptibility and identification, of 17 clinical isolates of Staphylococcus lugdunensis.
    Mateo M, Maestre JR, Aguilar L, Cafini F, Puente P, Sánchez P, Alou L, Giménez MJ, Prieto J.
    J Antimicrob Chemother; 2005 Aug; 56(2):287-91. PubMed ID: 15994248
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Evaluation of a cefoxitin disk diffusion test for the routine detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.
    Boutiba-Ben Boubaker I, Ben Abbes R, Ben Abdallah H, Mamlouk K, Mahjoubi F, Kammoun A, Hammami A, Ben Redjeb S.
    Clin Microbiol Infect; 2004 Aug; 10(8):762-5. PubMed ID: 15301683
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. [Short communication: use of cefoxitin disc diffusion method for the detection of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus clinical isolates].
    Coban AY, Darka O, Taşdelen Fişgin N, Aksakal Tanyel E, Cetinkaya Sensoy E, Hepsert SA, Birinci A, Durupinar B.
    Mikrobiyol Bul; 2007 Jan; 41(1):109-13. PubMed ID: 17427559
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. [Evaluation of the cefoxitin 30 microg disk diffusion method for detection of methicillin-resistance in selected Staphylococcus aureus isolates].
    Batista N, Gutiérrez I, Lara M, Laich F, Méndez S.
    Rev Esp Quimioter; 2008 Dec; 21(4):213-6. PubMed ID: 19031121
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. [Performance of different methods of oxacillin resistance detection in atypic strains of Staphylococcus aureus].
    Hamdad F, Donda F, Laurans G, Canarelli B, Rousseau F, Biendo M, Thomas D, Eb F.
    Pathol Biol (Paris); 2006 Dec; 54(8-9):447-52. PubMed ID: 17030459
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.