These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

790 related items for PubMed ID: 17905900

  • 1. Temporal envelope changes of compression and speech rate: combined effects on recognition for older adults.
    Jenstad LM, Souza PE.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Oct; 50(5):1123-38. PubMed ID: 17905900
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners.
    Burk MH, Humes LE, Amos NE, Strauser LE.
    Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):263-78. PubMed ID: 16672795
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.
    Smith SL, Pichora-Fuller MK, Wilson RH, Macdonald EN.
    Ear Hear; 2012 Jun; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Understanding compression: modeling the effects of dynamic-range compression in hearing aids.
    Kates JM.
    Int J Audiol; 2010 Jun; 49(6):395-409. PubMed ID: 20225931
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Combining temporal-envelope cues across channels: effects of age and hearing loss.
    Souza PE, Boike KT.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Feb; 49(1):138-49. PubMed ID: 16533079
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Auditory speech recognition and visual text recognition in younger and older adults: similarities and differences between modalities and the effects of presentation rate.
    Humes LE, Burk MH, Coughlin MP, Busey TA, Strauser LE.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Apr; 50(2):283-303. PubMed ID: 17463230
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Binaural advantage for younger and older adults with normal hearing.
    Dubno JR, Ahlstrom JB, Horwitz AR.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2008 Apr; 51(2):539-56. PubMed ID: 18367695
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Quantifying the effect of compression hearing aid release time on speech acoustics and intelligibility.
    Jenstad LM, Souza PE.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Jun; 48(3):651-67. PubMed ID: 16197279
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. The influence of age, hearing, and working memory on the speech comprehension benefit derived from an automatic speech recognition system.
    Zekveld AA, Kramer SE, Kessens JM, Vlaming MS, Houtgast T.
    Ear Hear; 2009 Apr; 30(2):262-72. PubMed ID: 19194286
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Speech recognition in fluctuating and continuous maskers: effects of hearing loss and presentation level.
    Summers V, Molis MR.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2004 Apr; 47(2):245-56. PubMed ID: 15157127
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Effects of hearing loss and spectral shaping on identification and neural response patterns of stop-consonant stimuli in young adults.
    Harkrider AW, Plyler PN, Hedrick MS.
    Ear Hear; 2009 Feb; 30(1):31-42. PubMed ID: 19125025
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Cognition and aided speech recognition in noise: specific role for cognitive factors following nine-week experience with adjusted compression settings in hearing aids.
    Rudner M, Foo C, Rönnberg J, Lunner T.
    Scand J Psychol; 2009 Oct; 50(5):405-18. PubMed ID: 19778388
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Development of APHAB norms for WDRC hearing aids and comparisons with original norms.
    Johnson JA, Cox RM, Alexander GC.
    Ear Hear; 2010 Feb; 31(1):47-55. PubMed ID: 19692903
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Audibility-index predictions of normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners' performance on the connected speech test.
    Sherbecoe RL, Studebaker GA.
    Ear Hear; 2003 Feb; 24(1):71-88. PubMed ID: 12598814
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Phonological mismatch makes aided speech recognition in noise cognitively taxing.
    Rudner M, Foo C, Rönnberg J, Lunner T.
    Ear Hear; 2007 Dec; 28(6):879-92. PubMed ID: 17982373
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Cognitive load during speech perception in noise: the influence of age, hearing loss, and cognition on the pupil response.
    Zekveld AA, Kramer SE, Festen JM.
    Ear Hear; 2011 Dec; 32(4):498-510. PubMed ID: 21233711
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Ranking hearing aid input-output functions for understanding low-, conversational-, and high-level speech in multitalker babble.
    Chung K, Killion MC, Christensen LA.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Apr; 50(2):304-22. PubMed ID: 17463231
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Temporal resolution in regions of normal hearing and speech perception in noise for adults with sloping high-frequency hearing loss.
    Feng Y, Yin S, Kiefte M, Wang J.
    Ear Hear; 2010 Feb; 31(1):115-25. PubMed ID: 19816181
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 40.