These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


1444 related items for PubMed ID: 17910230

  • 21. Effect of composite resin placement techniques on the microleakage of two self-etching dentin-bonding agents.
    Santini A, Plasschaert AJ, Mitchell S.
    Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):132-6. PubMed ID: 11572288
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Dentin bond strength and marginal adaptation: direct composite resins vs ceramic inlays.
    Frankenberger R, Sindel J, Krämer N, Petschelt A.
    Oper Dent; 1999 Jun; 24(3):147-55. PubMed ID: 10530276
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Enamel and dentin bond strength and bonding mechanism to dentin of Gluma CPS to primary teeth.
    Fritz U, García-Godoy F, Finger WJ.
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1997 Jun; 64(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 9096816
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Effect of restorative technique and thermal/mechanical treatment on marginal adaptation and compressive strength of esthetic restorations.
    de Paula AB, Duque C, Correr-Sobrinho L, Puppin-Rontani RM.
    Oper Dent; 2008 Jun; 33(4):434-40. PubMed ID: 18666502
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Restoration interface microleakage using one total-etch and three self-etch adhesives.
    Deliperi S, Bardwell DN, Wegley C.
    Oper Dent; 2007 Jun; 32(2):179-84. PubMed ID: 17427828
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Effect of different modes of light curing and resin composites on microleakage of Class II restorations.
    Hardan LS, Amm EW, Ghayad A.
    Odontostomatol Trop; 2008 Dec; 31(124):27-34. PubMed ID: 19441264
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Microleakage in class II restorations: open vs closed centripetal build-up technique.
    Fabianelli A, Sgarra A, Goracci C, Cantoro A, Pollington S, Ferrari M.
    Oper Dent; 2010 Dec; 35(3):308-13. PubMed ID: 20533631
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Marginal adaptation and microtensile bond strength of composite indirect restorations bonded to dentin treated with adhesive and low-viscosity composite.
    de Andrade OS, de Goes MF, Montes MA.
    Dent Mater; 2007 Mar; 23(3):279-87. PubMed ID: 16546249
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Laboratory evaluation of compomers in Class V restorations.
    Chersoni S, Lorenzi R, Ferrieri P, Prati C.
    Am J Dent; 1997 Jun; 10(3):147-51. PubMed ID: 9545890
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. The effect on shear bond strength of rewetting dry dentin with two desensitizers.
    Al Qahtani MQ, Platt JA, Moore BK, Cochran MA.
    Oper Dent; 2003 Jun; 28(3):287-96. PubMed ID: 12760701
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Microtensile bond strengths and interfacial examination of a polyalkenoate-based 1-step adhesive.
    Perdigão J, Sezinando A, Gomes G.
    Am J Dent; 2011 Aug; 24(4):215-20. PubMed ID: 22016915
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 73.