These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

171 related items for PubMed ID: 17919445

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Detecting visual function abnormalities using the Swedish interactive threshold algorithm and matrix perimetry in eyes with glaucomatous appearance of the optic disc.
    Sakata LM, Deleon-Ortega J, Arthur SN, Monheit BE, Girkin CA.
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2007 Mar; 125(3):340-5. PubMed ID: 17353404
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. SITA standard in optic neuropathies and hemianopias: a comparison with full threshold testing.
    Wall M, Punke SG, Stickney TL, Brito CF, Withrow KR, Kardon RH.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2001 Feb; 42(2):528-37. PubMed ID: 11157893
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Comparing multifocal VEP and standard automated perimetry in high-risk ocular hypertension and early glaucoma.
    Fortune B, Demirel S, Zhang X, Hood DC, Patterson E, Jamil A, Mansberger SL, Cioffi GA, Johnson CA.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Mar; 48(3):1173-80. PubMed ID: 17325161
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Diagnostic sensitivity of fast blue-yellow and standard automated perimetry in early glaucoma: a comparison between different test programs.
    Bengtsson B, Heijl A.
    Ophthalmology; 2006 Jul; 113(7):1092-7. PubMed ID: 16815399
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm for central visual field defects unrelated to nerve fiber layer.
    Hirasawa K, Shoji N.
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2016 May; 254(5):845-54. PubMed ID: 26279004
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Full-threshold versus Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm (SITA) in normal individuals undergoing automated perimetry for the first time.
    Schimiti RB, Avelino RR, Kara-José N, Costa VP.
    Ophthalmology; 2002 Nov; 109(11):2084-92; discussion 2092. PubMed ID: 12414419
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Comparison of the Humphrey swedish interactive thresholding algorithm (SITA) and full threshold strategies.
    Sharma AK, Goldberg I, Graham SL, Mohsin M.
    J Glaucoma; 2000 Feb; 9(1):20-7. PubMed ID: 10708227
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.