These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

171 related items for PubMed ID: 17919445

  • 21. Can Swedish interactive thresholding algorithm fast perimetry be used as an alternative to goldmann perimetry in neuro-ophthalmic practice?
    Szatmáry G, Biousse V, Newman NJ.
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2002 Sep; 120(9):1162-73. PubMed ID: 12215089
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Comparison of Humphrey MATRIX and Swedish interactive threshold algorithm standard strategy in detecting early glaucomatous visual field loss.
    Prema R, George R, Hemamalini A, Sathyamangalam Ve R, Baskaran M, Vijaya L.
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2009 Sep; 57(3):207-11. PubMed ID: 19384015
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Structure and function evaluation (SAFE): I. criteria for glaucomatous visual field loss using standard automated perimetry (SAP) and short wavelength automated perimetry (SWAP).
    Johnson CA, Sample PA, Cioffi GA, Liebmann JR, Weinreb RN.
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2002 Aug; 134(2):177-85. PubMed ID: 12140023
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Diagnostic accuracy of the Matrix 24-2 and original N-30 frequency-doubling technology tests compared with standard automated perimetry.
    Racette L, Medeiros FA, Zangwill LM, Ng D, Weinreb RN, Sample PA.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2008 Mar; 49(3):954-60. PubMed ID: 18326718
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Effect of cataract extraction on SITA perimetry in patients with glaucoma.
    Rehman Siddiqui MA, Khairy HA, Azuara-Blanco A.
    J Glaucoma; 2007 Mar; 16(2):205-8. PubMed ID: 17473731
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Bayesian machine learning classifiers for combining structural and functional measurements to classify healthy and glaucomatous eyes.
    Bowd C, Hao J, Tavares IM, Medeiros FA, Zangwill LM, Lee TW, Sample PA, Weinreb RN, Goldbaum MH.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2008 Mar; 49(3):945-53. PubMed ID: 18326717
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Automated perimetry: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.
    Delgado MF, Nguyen NT, Cox TA, Singh K, Lee DA, Dueker DK, Fechtner RD, Juzych MS, Lin SC, Netland PA, Pastor SA, Schuman JS, Samples JR, American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmic Technology Assessment Committee 2001-2002 Glaucoma Panel.
    Ophthalmology; 2002 Dec; 109(12):2362-74. PubMed ID: 12466186
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. 24-2 SITA Standard versus 24-2 SITA Faster in Perimetry-Naive Normal Subjects.
    Costa VP, Zangalli CS, Jammal AA, Medeiros FA, Miyazaki JVMK, Perez V, Nardi Boscaroli ML, Schimiti RB.
    Ophthalmol Glaucoma; 2023 Dec; 6(2):129-136. PubMed ID: 35985477
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. A new rapid threshold algorithm for short-wavelength automated perimetry.
    Bengtsson B.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2003 Mar; 44(3):1388-94. PubMed ID: 12601072
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. A New SITA Perimetric Threshold Testing Algorithm: Construction and a Multicenter Clinical Study.
    Heijl A, Patella VM, Chong LX, Iwase A, Leung CK, Tuulonen A, Lee GC, Callan T, Bengtsson B.
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2019 Feb; 198():154-165. PubMed ID: 30336129
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Frequency doubling technology for earlier detection of functional damage in standard automated perimetry-normal hemifield in glaucoma with low-to-normal pressure.
    Nakagawa S, Murata H, Saito H, Nakahara H, Mataki N, Tomidokoro A, Iwase A, Araie M.
    J Glaucoma; 2012 Jan; 21(1):22-6. PubMed ID: 21543995
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Comparison of standard automated perimetry, frequency-doubling technology perimetry, and short-wavelength automated perimetry for detection of glaucoma.
    Liu S, Lam S, Weinreb RN, Ye C, Cheung CY, Lai G, Lam DS, Leung CK.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2011 Sep 21; 52(10):7325-31. PubMed ID: 21810975
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. A Strategy for Seeding Point Error Assessment for Retesting (SPEAR) in Perimetry Applied to Normal Subjects, Glaucoma Suspects, and Patients With Glaucoma.
    Phu J, Kalloniatis M.
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2021 Jan 21; 221():115-130. PubMed ID: 32777379
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Properties of perimetric threshold estimates from full threshold, ZEST, and SITA-like strategies, as determined by computer simulation.
    Turpin A, McKendrick AM, Johnson CA, Vingrys AJ.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2003 Nov 21; 44(11):4787-95. PubMed ID: 14578400
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Sensitivity and specificity of the Swedish interactive threshold algorithm for glaucomatous visual field defects.
    Budenz DL, Rhee P, Feuer WJ, McSoley J, Johnson CA, Anderson DR.
    Ophthalmology; 2002 Jun 21; 109(6):1052-8. PubMed ID: 12045043
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Comparison of Swedish interactive threshold algorithm and full threshold algorithm for glaucomatous visual field loss.
    Aoki Y, Takahashi G, Kitahara K.
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2007 Jun 21; 17(2):196-202. PubMed ID: 17415692
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. The SITA perimetric threshold algorithms in glaucoma.
    Wild JM, Pacey IE, O'Neill EC, Cunliffe IA.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1999 Aug 21; 40(9):1998-2009. PubMed ID: 10440254
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Threshold and variability properties of matrix frequency-doubling technology and standard automated perimetry in glaucoma.
    Artes PH, Hutchison DM, Nicolela MT, LeBlanc RP, Chauhan BC.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Jul 21; 46(7):2451-7. PubMed ID: 15980235
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Does the Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm (SITA) accurately map visual field loss attributed to vigabatrin?
    Conway ML, Hosking SL, Zhu H, Cubbidge RP.
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2014 Dec 23; 14():166. PubMed ID: 25539569
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Evaluation of two Humphrey perimetry programs: full threshold and SITA standard testing strategy for learning effect.
    Yenice O, Temel A.
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2005 Dec 23; 15(2):209-12. PubMed ID: 15812761
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.