These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
304 related items for PubMed ID: 17923714
1. Mechanical versus chemical retention for restoring complex restorations: what is the evidence? Vaught RL. J Dent Educ; 2007 Oct; 71(10):1356-62. PubMed ID: 17923714 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. In vitro evaluation of the use of resin liners to reduce microleakage and improve retention of amalgam restorations. Charlton DG, Moore BK, Swartz ML. Oper Dent; 1992 Oct; 17(3):112-9. PubMed ID: 1437693 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Fracture resistance of complex amalgam restorations. Burgess JO, Alvarez A, Summitt JB. Oper Dent; 1997 Oct; 22(3):128-32. PubMed ID: 9484151 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The effect of different adhesive systems on the retention strength of bonded amalgam restorations. Ghavamnasiri M, Moosavi H. J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Feb 01; 9(2):97-104. PubMed ID: 18264531 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The performance of bonded vs. pin-retained complex amalgam restorations: a five-year clinical evaluation. Summitt JB, Burgess JO, Berry TG, Robbins JW, Osborne JW, Haveman CW. J Am Dent Assoc; 2001 Jul 01; 132(7):923-31. PubMed ID: 11480646 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]