These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


345 related items for PubMed ID: 17926217

  • 21. The ethical implications of human cloning.
    Sandel MJ.
    Perspect Biol Med; 2005; 48(2):241-7. PubMed ID: 15834196
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. On moral incoherence and hidden battles: stem cell research in Argentina.
    Luna F, Salles A.
    Dev World Bioeth; 2010 Dec; 10(3):120-8. PubMed ID: 20089053
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Beyond politics--the strange saga of the President's Council on Bioethics.
    Keim B.
    Genewatch; 2004 Dec; 17(3):6-10. PubMed ID: 15459988
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Legal trends in bioethics.
    Onel S, Fry-Revere S.
    J Clin Ethics; 1992 Dec; 3(3):242-6. PubMed ID: 1392051
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Courts as actors of policy making in bioethics.
    Byk C.
    J Int Bioethique; 2006 Dec; 17(1-2):57-9, 160. PubMed ID: 17902321
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Stem cell research: the bigger picture.
    Dresser R.
    Perspect Biol Med; 2005 Dec; 48(2):181-94. PubMed ID: 15834191
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Scientism or luddism: is informed ethical dialogue possible?
    Jones NL.
    Am J Bioeth; 2004 Dec; 4(1):18-20; discussion W31-2. PubMed ID: 15035929
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. The Vatican document on bioethics: some unsolicited suggestions.
    McCormick RA.
    America (NY); 1987 Jan 17; 156(2):24-28, 39. PubMed ID: 11658745
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Promises and perils of public deliberation: contrasting two national bioethics commissions on embryonic stem cell research.
    Cohen CB.
    Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 2005 Sep 17; 15(3):269-88. PubMed ID: 16250108
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Deliberative Democracy and stem cell research in New York State: the good, the bad, and the ugly.
    Sulmasy DP.
    Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 2009 Mar 17; 19(1):63-78. PubMed ID: 19306697
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Patenting, morality and human embryonic stem cell science: bioethics and cultural politics in Europe.
    Salter B.
    Regen Med; 2007 May 17; 2(3):301-11. PubMed ID: 17511566
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Biomedical policy. Bush squeezes between the lines on stem cells.
    Vogel G.
    Science; 2001 Aug 17; 293(5533):1242-5. PubMed ID: 11509703
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 18.