These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Acceptable range of speech level in noisy sound fields for young adults and elderly persons. Sato H, Morimoto M, Ota R. J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1411-9. PubMed ID: 21895082 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Subjective and objective effects of fast and slow compression on the perception of reverberant speech in listeners with hearing loss. Shi LF, Doherty KA. J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2008 Oct; 51(5):1328-40. PubMed ID: 18664685 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Modeling speech intelligibility in quiet and noise in listeners with normal and impaired hearing. Rhebergen KS, Lyzenga J, Dreschler WA, Festen JM. J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Mar; 127(3):1570-83. PubMed ID: 20329857 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of slow-acting wide dynamic range compression on measures of intelligibility and ratings of speech quality in simulated-loss listeners. Rosengard PS, Payton KL, Braida LD. J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Jun; 48(3):702-14. PubMed ID: 16197282 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Speech recognition and working memory capacity in young-elderly listeners: effects of hearing sensitivity. Cervera TC, Soler MJ, Dasi C, Ruiz JC. Can J Exp Psychol; 2009 Sep; 63(3):216-26. PubMed ID: 19739905 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Relationship between listening difficulty rating and objective measures in reverberant and noisy sound fields for young adults and elderly persons. Sato H, Morimoto M, Wada M. J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Jun; 131(6):4596-605. PubMed ID: 22712933 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Perceptual integration between target speech and target-speech reflection reduces masking for target-speech recognition in younger adults and older adults. Huang Y, Huang Q, Chen X, Qu T, Wu X, Li L. Hear Res; 2008 Oct; 244(1-2):51-65. PubMed ID: 18694813 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The effect of presentation level on memory performance. Heinrich A, Schneider BA. Ear Hear; 2011 Oct; 32(4):524-32. PubMed ID: 21278574 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of white noise on the most comfortable level for speech with normal listeners. Beattie RC, Zentil A, Svihovec DA. J Aud Res; 1982 Jan; 22(1):71-6. PubMed ID: 7187912 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of room acoustics on the intelligibility of speech in classrooms for young children. Yang W, Bradley JS. J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Feb; 125(2):922-33. PubMed ID: 19206869 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Children's speech recognition scores: the Speech Intelligibility Index and proficiency factors for age and hearing level. Scollie SD. Ear Hear; 2008 Aug; 29(4):543-56. PubMed ID: 18469717 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Perception of clear fricatives by normal-hearing and simulated hearing-impaired listeners. Maniwa K, Jongman A, Wade T. J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Feb; 123(2):1114-25. PubMed ID: 18247912 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The effects of speech presentation level on acceptance of noise in listeners with normal and impaired hearing. Freyaldenhoven MC, Plyler PN, Thelin JW, Hedrick MS. J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Aug; 50(4):878-85. PubMed ID: 17675593 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]