These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

417 related items for PubMed ID: 17936127

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Fracture resistance of teeth directly and indirectly restored with composite resin and indirectly restored with ceramic materials.
    Dalpino PH, Francischone CE, Ishikiriama A, Franco EB.
    Am J Dent; 2002 Dec; 15(6):389-94. PubMed ID: 12691276
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated molars restored with extensive composite resin restorations.
    Plotino G, Buono L, Grande NM, Lamorgese V, Somma F.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Mar; 99(3):225-32. PubMed ID: 18319094
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Fracture resistance of thermal cycled and endodontically treated premolars with adhesive restorations.
    de V Habekost L, Camacho GB, Azevedo EC, Demarco FF.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Sep; 98(3):186-92. PubMed ID: 17854619
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars restored with CAD/CAM ceramic inlays.
    Hannig C, Westphal C, Becker K, Attin T.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Oct; 94(4):342-9. PubMed ID: 16198171
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. The effect of cuspal coverage on the fracture resistance of teeth restored with indirect composite resin restorations.
    Burke FJ, Wilson NH, Watts DC.
    Quintessence Int; 1993 Dec; 24(12):875-80. PubMed ID: 20830883
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. In vitro evaluation of push-out bond strength of direct ceramic inlays to tooth surface with fiber-reinforced composite at the interface.
    Cekic I, Ergun G, Uctasli S, Lassila LV.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 May; 97(5):271-8. PubMed ID: 17547945
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Fracture strength of cusp replacing resin composite restorations.
    Kuijs RH, Fennis WM, Kreulen CM, Roeters JJ, Burgersdijk RC.
    Am J Dent; 2003 Feb; 16(1):13-6. PubMed ID: 12744406
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Influence of restorative technique on the biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated maxillary premolars. Part II: strain measurement and stress distribution.
    Soares PV, Santos-Filho PC, Gomide HA, Araujo CA, Martins LR, Soares CJ.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):114-22. PubMed ID: 18262012
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Influence of different transitional restorations on the fracture resistance of premolar teeth.
    Qualtrough AJ, Cawte SG, Wilson NH.
    Oper Dent; 2001 Feb; 26(3):267-72. PubMed ID: 11357569
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 21.