These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
424 related items for PubMed ID: 17944641
1. Prospective randomized comparison of the new Laryngeal Tube Suction LTS II and the LMA-ProSeal for elective surgical interventions. Genzwuerker HV, Altmayer S, Hinkelbein J, Gernoth C, Viergutz T, Ocker H. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2007 Nov; 51(10):1373-7. PubMed ID: 17944641 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Prospective, randomized comparison of laryngeal tube and laryngeal mask airway in pediatric patients. Genzwuerker HV, Fritz A, Hinkelbein J, Finteis T, Schlaefer A, Schaeffer M, Thil E, Rapp HJ. Paediatr Anaesth; 2006 Dec; 16(12):1251-6. PubMed ID: 17121555 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The laryngeal mask airway Supreme--a single use laryngeal mask airway with an oesophageal vent. A randomised, cross-over study with the laryngeal mask airway ProSeal in paralysed, anaesthetised patients. Eschertzhuber S, Brimacombe J, Hohlrieder M, Keller C. Anaesthesia; 2009 Jan; 64(1):79-83. PubMed ID: 19087011 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Laryngeal tube S II, ProSeal laryngeal mask, and EasyTube during elective surgery: a randomized controlled comparison with the endotracheal tube in nontrained professionals. Cavus E, Deitmer W, Francksen H, Serocki G, Bein B, Scholz J, Doerges V. Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2009 Sep; 26(9):730-5. PubMed ID: 19373095 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of the laryngeal tube-S and Proseal laryngeal mask during outpatient surgical procedures. Zand F, Amini A, Sadeghi SE, Gureishi M, Chohedri A. Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2007 Oct; 24(10):847-51. PubMed ID: 17608965 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of the laryngeal mask (LMA) and laryngeal tube (LT) with the new perilaryngeal airway (CobraPLA) in short surgical procedures. Turan A, Kaya G, Koyuncu O, Karamanlioglu B, Pamukçu Z. Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2006 Mar; 23(3):234-8. PubMed ID: 16430795 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of the VBM laryngeal tube and laryngeal mask airway for ventilation during manual in-line neck stabilisation. Noor Zairul M, Khairul Faizi A. Singapore Med J; 2006 Oct; 47(10):892-6. PubMed ID: 16990966 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. A new supraglottic airway device: LMA-supreme, comparison with LMA-Proseal. Hosten T, Gurkan Y, Ozdamar D, Tekin M, Toker K, Solak M. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2009 Aug; 53(7):852-7. PubMed ID: 19426239 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Laryngeal tube S II, laryngeal tube S disposable, Fastrach laryngeal mask and Fastrach laryngeal mask disposable during elective surgery: a randomized controlled comparison between reusable and disposable supraglottic airway devices. Thee C, Serocki G, Doerges V, Ilies C, Wallenius K, Bein B, Steinfath M, Cavus E. Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2010 May; 27(5):468-72. PubMed ID: 20216069 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Randomized prospective study comparing the laryngeal tube suction II with the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in anesthetized and paralyzed patients. Kikuchi T, Kamiya Y, Ohtsuka T, Miki T, Goto T. Anesthesiology; 2008 Jul; 109(1):54-60. PubMed ID: 18580172 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Positive pressure ventilation with the size 5 laryngeal mask. Brimacombe JR. J Clin Anesth; 1997 Mar; 9(2):113-7. PubMed ID: 9075035 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The Proseal laryngeal mask airway in children: a comparison between two insertion techniques. Teoh CY, Lim FS. Paediatr Anaesth; 2008 Feb; 18(2):119-24. PubMed ID: 18184242 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of the clinical use of the Laryngeal Tube S and the ProSeal Laryngeal Mask Airway by first-month anaesthesia residents in anaesthetised patients. Klaver NS, Kuizenga K, Ballast A, Fidler V. Anaesthesia; 2007 Jul; 62(7):723-7. PubMed ID: 17567350 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [A comparison of the Proseal laryngeal mask to the standard laryngeal mask on anesthesized, non-relaxed patients]. Braun U, Zerbst M, Füllekrug B, Gentzel I, Hempel V, Leier M, Peters T, Hobbensiefken G, Klein U, Heuser D, Weyland A, Rey D, Weirich C, Krier C. Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther; 2002 Dec; 37(12):727-33. PubMed ID: 12469285 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The effects of head flexion on airway seal, quality of ventilation and orogastric tube placement using the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway. Xue FS, Mao P, Liu HP, Yang QY, Li CW, He N, Xu YC, Liao X. Anaesthesia; 2008 Sep; 63(9):979-85. PubMed ID: 18699873 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Cricoid pressure impedes insertion of, and ventilation through, the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in anesthetized, paralyzed patients. Li CW, Xue FS, Xu YC, Liu Y, Mao P, Liu KP, Yang QY, Zhang GH, Sun HT. Anesth Analg; 2007 May; 104(5):1195-8, tables of contents. PubMed ID: 17456674 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of the laryngeal mask airway Supreme and laryngeal mask airway Classic in adults. Ali A, Canturk S, Turkmen A, Turgut N, Altan A. Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2009 Dec; 26(12):1010-4. PubMed ID: 19707148 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Similar oropharyngeal leak pressures during anaesthesia with i-gel, LMA-ProSeal and LMA-Supreme Laryngeal Masks. Van Zundert TC, Brimacombe JR. Acta Anaesthesiol Belg; 2012 Dec; 63(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 22783708 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Comparison of the Laryngeal Tube Suction and the Proseal laryngeal Mask Airway in anesthetized patients]. Ueno M, Suzuki A, Takahata O, Iwasaki H. Masui; 2008 Sep; 57(9):1131-5. PubMed ID: 18807900 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of the LMA-ProSeal and LMA-Classic in children. Shimbori H, Ono K, Miwa T, Morimura N, Noguchi M, Hiroki K. Br J Anaesth; 2004 Oct; 93(4):528-31. PubMed ID: 15298876 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]