These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


213 related items for PubMed ID: 17961946

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Measurement of the ascending aorta diameter in patients with severe bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valve stenosis using dual-source computed tomography coronary angiography.
    Son JY, Ko SM, Choi JW, Song MG, Hwang HK, Lee SJ, Kang JW.
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2011 Dec; 27 Suppl 1():61-71. PubMed ID: 22009020
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Effect of age and aortic valve anatomy on calcification and haemodynamic severity of aortic stenosis.
    Shen M, Tastet L, Capoulade R, Larose É, Bédard É, Arsenault M, Chetaille P, Dumesnil JG, Mathieu P, Clavel MA, Pibarot P.
    Heart; 2017 Jan 01; 103(1):32-39. PubMed ID: 27504001
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Fused aortic valve without an elliptical-shaped systolic orifice in patients with severe aortic stenosis: cardiac computed tomography is useful for differentiation between bicuspid aortic valve with raphe and tricuspid aortic valve with commissural fusion.
    Bak SH, Ko SM, Song MG, Shin JK, Chee HK, Kim JS.
    Eur Radiol; 2015 Apr 01; 25(4):1208-17. PubMed ID: 25424562
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Ex vivo assessment of valve thickness/calcification of patients with calcific aortic stenosis in relation to in vivo clinical outcomes.
    Cheng CL, Chang HH, Huang PJ, Wang WC, Lin SY.
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2017 Oct 01; 74():324-332. PubMed ID: 28651163
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Incidental aortic valve calcification on CT scans: significance for bicuspid and tricuspid valve disease.
    Hope MD, Urbania TH, Yu JP, Chitsaz S, Tseng E.
    Acad Radiol; 2012 May 01; 19(5):542-7. PubMed ID: 22104287
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Evidence of subannular and left ventricular morphological differences in patients with bicuspid versus tricuspid aortic valve stenosis: magnetic resonance imaging-based analysis.
    Disha K, Dubslaff G, Rouman M, Fey B, Borger MA, Barker AJ, Kuntze T, Girdauskas E.
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2017 Mar 01; 24(3):369-376. PubMed ID: 28040769
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Feasibility of a single-beat prospective ECG-gated cardiac CT for comprehensive evaluation of aortic valve disease using a 256-detector row wide-volume CT scanner: an initial experience.
    Kim JY, Suh YJ, Chang S, Im DJ, Hong YJ, Lee HJ, Hur J, Kim YJ, Choi BW.
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 Feb 01; 34(2):293-300. PubMed ID: 28770455
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.