These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

784 related items for PubMed ID: 17964212

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Refractive index and equilibrium water content of conventional and silicone hydrogel contact lenses.
    González-Méijome JM, Lira M, López-Alemany A, Almeida JB, Parafita MA, Refojo MF.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2006 Jan; 26(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 16390483
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Bacterial adhesion to worn silicone hydrogel contact lenses.
    Santos L, Rodrigues D, Lira M, Real Oliveira ME, Oliveira R, Vilar EY, Azeredo J.
    Optom Vis Sci; 2008 Jul; 85(7):520-5. PubMed ID: 18594343
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Initial comfort of lotrafilcon A silicone hydrogel contact lenses versus etafilcon A contact lenses for extended wear.
    Martin R, de Juan V, Rodriguez G, Martin S, Fonseca S.
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2007 Mar; 30(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 17178252
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Proteins identified from care solution extractions of silicone hydrogels.
    Emch AJ, Nichols JJ.
    Optom Vis Sci; 2009 Feb; 86(2):E123-31. PubMed ID: 19156010
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Predicting success with silicone-hydrogel contact lenses in new wearers.
    Best N, Drury L, Wolffsohn JS.
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2013 Oct; 36(5):232-7. PubMed ID: 23522993
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Adverse events and discontinuations during 18 months of silicone hydrogel contact lens wear.
    Santodomingo-Rubido J, Wolffsohn JS, Gilmartin B.
    Eye Contact Lens; 2007 Nov; 33(6 Pt 1):288-92. PubMed ID: 17993823
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. The adsorption of major tear film lipids in vitro to various silicone hydrogels over time.
    Carney FP, Nash WL, Sentell KB.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2008 Jan; 49(1):120-4. PubMed ID: 18172083
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Comparison of conventional and silicone hydrogel contact lenses for bullous keratoplasty.
    Lim N, Vogt U.
    Eye Contact Lens; 2006 Sep; 32(5):250-3. PubMed ID: 16974160
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. The clinical performance of a silicone hydrogel lens for daily wear in an Asian population.
    Long B, McNally J.
    Eye Contact Lens; 2006 Mar; 32(2):65-71. PubMed ID: 16538125
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 40.