These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

134 related items for PubMed ID: 17966002

  • 1. In vivo failure analysis of intramedullary cement restrictors in 100 hip arthroplasties.
    Bitsch RG, Breusch SJ, Thomsen M, Schneider S, Heisel C.
    Acta Orthop; 2007 Aug; 78(4):485-90. PubMed ID: 17966002
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Inferior stability of a biodegradable cement plug. 122 total hip replacements randomized to degradable or non-degradable cement restrictor.
    Schauss SM, Hinz M, Mayr E, Bach CM, Krismer M, Fischer M.
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2006 Jul; 126(5):324-9. PubMed ID: 16612619
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Performance of 3 gelatine-based resorbable cement plugs: a study on 15 synthetic femurs and a prospective randomized study on 103 patients.
    Kroon M, Visser CP, Mootanah R, Brand R.
    Acta Orthop; 2006 Dec; 77(6):893-8. PubMed ID: 17260197
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. [Air permeable diaphyseal obturators: efficacity of femoral cementing and prevention of associated cardiovascular disorders].
    Caton J, Prudhon JL, Aslanian T, Lifante JC, Ritz B.
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2002 Dec; 88(8):767-76. PubMed ID: 12503018
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Cement restrictor function below the femoral isthmus.
    Moran M, Heisel C, Rupp R, Simpson AH, Breusch SJ.
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2007 May; 458():111-6. PubMed ID: 17206103
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. The effect of two different types of cement restrictors on the femoral cement mantle.
    Faraj AA, Rajasekar K.
    Acta Orthop Belg; 2006 Dec; 72(6):702-8. PubMed ID: 17260607
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Radiographic analysis of a bone plug in 275 primary cemented total hip arthroplasties.
    Vanderstappen J, Simon JP, Bellemans J.
    Acta Orthop Belg; 2012 Jun; 78(3):350-6. PubMed ID: 22822576
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. In vitro performance of intramedullary cement restrictors in total hip arthroplasty.
    Heisel C, Norman T, Rupp R, Pritsch M, Ewerbeck V, Breusch SJ.
    J Biomech; 2003 Jun; 36(6):835-43. PubMed ID: 12742451
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. A comparison of 2 modern femoral cementing techniques: analysis by cement-bone interface pressure measurements, computerized image analysis, and static mechanical testing.
    Reading AD, McCaskie AW, Barnes MR, Gregg PJ.
    J Arthroplasty; 2000 Jun; 15(4):479-87. PubMed ID: 10884209
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Cement mantle retention: filling the hole.
    Cross M, Bostrom M.
    Orthopedics; 2009 Sep; 32(9):. PubMed ID: 19751012
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Impact of stem-broach sizing on the cement mantle of Lubinus SP II stems. A CT scan analysis.
    Scheerlinck T, de Mey J, Deklerck R.
    Acta Orthop Belg; 2009 Jun; 75(3):346-53. PubMed ID: 19681321
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.