These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

187 related items for PubMed ID: 17971057

  • 1. Spatial compatibility between stimulated eye and response location.
    Valle-Inclán F, Sohn F, Redondo M.
    Psychophysiology; 2008 Mar; 45(2):279-85. PubMed ID: 17971057
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Perceptual load affects spatial and nonspatial visual selection processes: an event-related brain potential study.
    Barnhardt J, Ritter W, Gomes H.
    Neuropsychologia; 2008 Mar; 46(7):2071-8. PubMed ID: 18355882
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Compatibility between stimulated eye, target location and response location.
    Schankin A, Valle-Inclán F, Hackley SA.
    Psychol Res; 2010 May; 74(3):291-301. PubMed ID: 19521718
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Directing attention to a location in space results in retinotopic activation in primary visual cortex.
    Munneke J, Heslenfeld DJ, Theeuwes J.
    Brain Res; 2008 Jul 30; 1222():184-91. PubMed ID: 18589405
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Location and features of instructive spatial cues do not influence the time course of covert shifts of visual spatial attention.
    Müller MM.
    Biol Psychol; 2008 Mar 30; 77(3):292-303. PubMed ID: 18083290
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Stimulus-response compatibility for mixed mappings and tasks with unique responses.
    Proctor RW, Vu KP.
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Feb 30; 63(2):320-40. PubMed ID: 19526436
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Early visual selection in near and far space: an event-related potential study.
    Kasai T.
    Neuroreport; 2008 Jun 11; 19(9):961-4. PubMed ID: 18521001
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Photic-induced sensitization: eye-specific neural plasticity and effect of behavioral state.
    Manning KA, Galganski LA, Uhlrich DJ.
    Neuroscience; 2007 May 25; 146(3):1413-24. PubMed ID: 17391857
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Spatio-temporal dynamics of visual selective attention identified by a common spatial pattern decomposition method.
    Li L, Yao D, Yin G.
    Brain Res; 2009 Jul 28; 1282():84-94. PubMed ID: 19501069
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Transient and sustained brain activity during anticipatory visuospatial attention.
    Luks TL, Sun FT, Dale CL, Miller WL, Simpson GV.
    Neuroreport; 2008 Jan 22; 19(2):155-9. PubMed ID: 18185100
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Differential dynamics of spatial and non-spatial stimulus-response compatibility effects: a dual task LRP study.
    Lehle C, Cohen A, Sangals J, Sommer W, Stürmer B.
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Jan 22; 136(1):42-51. PubMed ID: 21030005
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. The effect of response-delay on estimating reachability.
    Gabbard C, Ammar D.
    Int J Neurosci; 2008 Nov 22; 118(11):1502-14. PubMed ID: 18853329
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Stimulus-response compatibility between stimulated eye and response location: implications for attentional accounts of the Simon effect.
    Valle-Inclán F, Hackley SA, De Labra C.
    Psychol Res; 2003 Nov 22; 67(4):240-3. PubMed ID: 12761624
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.