These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

175 related items for PubMed ID: 17971110

  • 1. Accuracy of a fixed value nasion relator in facebow design.
    Wilcox CW, Sheets JL, Wilwerding TM.
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Jan; 17(1):31-4. PubMed ID: 17971110
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Individual variation of the distance between nasion and Frankfort horizontal plane-an error factor of facebow in semi-adjustable articulators.
    Casagrande Urdalleta DP, Olmedo RR, Cacciuttolo Fábrega FR, Biotti Picand JL.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Oct; 128(4):604.e1-604.e5. PubMed ID: 36309468
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. A reevaluation of the axis-orbital plane and the use of orbitale in a facebow transfer record.
    Pitchford JH.
    J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Sep; 66(3):349-55. PubMed ID: 1800732
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Three-dimensional analysis system for orthognathic surgery patients with jaw deformities.
    Terajima M, Yanagita N, Ozeki K, Hoshino Y, Mori N, Goto TK, Tokumori K, Aoki Y, Nakasima A.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jul; 134(1):100-11. PubMed ID: 18617109
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. The angle between the Frankfort horizontal and the sella-nasion line. Changes in porion and orbitale position during growth.
    Greiner P, Müller B, Dibbets J.
    J Orofac Orthop; 2004 May; 65(3):217-22. PubMed ID: 15160248
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Face bow and articulator for planning orthognathic surgery: 1 face bow.
    Walker F, Ayoub AF, Moos KF, Barbenel J.
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Oct; 46(7):567-72. PubMed ID: 18462852
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Standards of soft tissue Arnett analysis for surgical planning in Turkish adults.
    Uysal T, Yagci A, Basciftci FA, Sisman Y.
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Aug; 31(4):449-56. PubMed ID: 19482876
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Predicted incidence of excursive occlusal errors in common modes of articulator adjustment.
    Pröschel PA, Maul T, Morneburg T.
    Int J Prosthodont; 2000 Aug; 13(4):303-10. PubMed ID: 11203646
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Orthognathic diagnosis using the proportionate template.
    Jacobson A.
    J Oral Surg; 1980 Nov; 38(11):820-33. PubMed ID: 6932495
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. [Comparison of location between nasion and orbital points on soft tissue and on bony structures, in articulatory technique].
    Seifert D, Vukovojac S, Muretić Z, Pandurić J.
    Acta Stomatol Croat; 1991 Nov; 25(2):97-102. PubMed ID: 1819939
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Cephalometric analysis of profile nasal esthetics. Part II. Patients with vertical maxillary excess.
    de Assis EA, Starck WJ, Epker BN.
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1996 Nov; 11(3):205-10. PubMed ID: 9456623
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Using computerized cephalometrics to analyze the vertical dimension of occlusion.
    Edwards CL, Richards MW, Billy EJ, Neilans LC.
    Int J Prosthodont; 1993 Nov; 6(4):371-6. PubMed ID: 8240648
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. A protocol for cranial base reference in cephalometric studies.
    Alves PV, Mazucheli J, Vogel CJ, Bolognese AM.
    J Craniofac Surg; 2008 Jan; 19(1):211-5. PubMed ID: 18216691
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Accuracy of combined maxillary and mandibular repositioning and of soft tissue prediction in relation to maxillary antero-superior repositioning combined with mandibular set back A computerized cephalometric evaluation of the immediate postsurgical outcome using the TIOPS planning system.
    Donatsky O, Bjørn-Jørgensen J, Hermund NU, Nielsen H, Holmqvist-Larsen M, Nerder PH.
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2009 Jul; 37(5):279-84. PubMed ID: 19188076
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Computer-based analysis of 227 white males and females to establish range of malar-maxillary cephalometric relationships.
    Leonard MS, Walker GF.
    J Oral Surg; 1977 Dec; 35(12):974-6. PubMed ID: 270563
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. [A new cephalometric analysis of the profile. 1. Anatomic bases, cephalometry].
    Gola R, Cheynet F, Guyot L, Bellot-Samson V.
    Orthod Fr; 2002 Dec; 73(4):439-50. PubMed ID: 12528248
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Interalar distance to estimate the combined width of the six maxillary anterior teeth in oral rehabilitation treatment.
    Gomes VL, Gonçalves LC, Costa MM, Lucas Bde L.
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2009 Dec; 21(1):26-35; discussion 36. PubMed ID: 19207455
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Tooth movements adjacent to single-implant restorations after more than 15 years of follow-up.
    Jemt T, Ahlberg G, Henriksson K, Bondevik O.
    Int J Prosthodont; 2007 Dec; 20(6):626-32. PubMed ID: 18069373
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. The location of the infraorbital foramen in human skulls, to be used as new anthropometric landmarks as a useful method for maxillofacial surgery.
    Przygocka A, Podgórski M, Jędrzejewski K, Topol M, Polguj M.
    Folia Morphol (Warsz); 2012 Aug; 71(3):198-204. PubMed ID: 22936558
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Nevoid Basal cell carcinoma syndrome: a cephalometric study of patients and controls.
    Leonardi R, Licciardello V, Santarelli A, Ciavarella D, Bolouri S, Härle F, Caltabiano M, Lo Muzio L.
    J Craniofac Surg; 2009 Jan; 20(1):203-8. PubMed ID: 19165028
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.