These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

126 related items for PubMed ID: 17974106

  • 1. A systematic review of the effectiveness of bone collectors.
    Graziani F, Cei S, Ivanovski S, La Ferla F, Gabriele M.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(5):729-35. PubMed ID: 17974106
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Bacterial contamination of autogenous bone collected by rongeur compared with that collected by bone filter during implant surgery.
    Hashemi HM, Beshkar M.
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Sep; 49(6):474-7. PubMed ID: 20828895
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. [Bone collected with a bone collector during dental implant surgery].
    Kuttenberger JJ, Hardt N, Rutz T, Pfyffer GE.
    Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir; 2005 Jan; 9(1):18-23. PubMed ID: 15688239
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Decontamination of autogenous bone grafts collected from dental implant sites via osteotomy: a review.
    Tezulas E, Dilek OC.
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Nov; 106(5):679-84. PubMed ID: 18755618
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. The effects of an immediately pre-surgical chlorhexidine oral rinse on the bacterial contaminants of bone debris collected during dental implant surgery.
    Young MP, Korachi M, Carter DH, Worthington HV, McCord JF, Drucker DB.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2002 Feb; 13(1):20-9. PubMed ID: 12005141
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Performance of six bone collectors designed for dental implant surgery.
    Kainulainen VT, Kainulainen TJ, Oikarinen KS, Carmichael RP, Sàndor GK.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Jun; 17(3):282-7. PubMed ID: 16672023
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Bacterial contamination levels of autogenous bone particles collected by 3 different techniques for harvesting intraoral bone grafts.
    Manzano-Moreno FJ, Herrera-Briones FJ, Linares-Recatala M, Ocaña-Peinado FM, Reyes-Botella C, Vallecillo-Capilla MF.
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Mar; 73(3):424-9. PubMed ID: 25683043
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Decontamination of autogenous bone grafts collected during dental implant site preparation: a pilot study.
    Tezulas E, Dilek OC, Topcuoglu N, Kulekci G.
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 May; 107(5):656-60. PubMed ID: 19201221
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Microbial analysis of bone collected during implant surgery: a clinical and laboratory study.
    Young MP, Carter DH, Worthington H, Korachi M, Drucker DB.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2001 Apr; 12(2):95-103. PubMed ID: 11251657
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Risk of bacterial contamination of bone harvesting devices used for autogenous bone graft in implant surgery.
    Takamoto M, Takechi M, Ohta K, Ninomiya Y, Ono S, Shigeishi H, Tada M, Kamata N.
    Head Face Med; 2013 Jan 11; 9():3. PubMed ID: 23311758
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Maxillary sinus floor augmentation and simultaneous implant placement using locally harvested autogenous bone chips and bone debris: a prospective clinical study.
    Johansson LA, Isaksson S, Lindh C, Becktor JP, Sennerby L.
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Apr 11; 68(4):837-44. PubMed ID: 20307768
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Autogenous particulate bone collected with a piezo-electric surgical device and bone trap: a microbiological and histomorphometric study.
    Sivolella S, Berengo M, Scarin M, Mella F, Martinelli F.
    Arch Oral Biol; 2006 Oct 11; 51(10):883-91. PubMed ID: 16822476
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Microbial analysis of the autogenous bone collected by bone filter during oral surgery: a clinical study.
    Kürkçü M, Oz IA, Köksal F, Benlidayi ME, Güneşli A.
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Nov 11; 63(11):1593-8. PubMed ID: 16243175
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. A novel bone scraper for intraoral harvesting: a device for filling small bone defects.
    Zaffe D, D'Avenia F.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Aug 11; 18(4):525-33. PubMed ID: 17441981
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Bone collected during dental implant surgery: a clinical and histological study.
    Young MP, Worthington HV, Lloyd RE, Drucker DB, Sloan P, Carter DH.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2002 Jun 11; 13(3):298-303. PubMed ID: 12010161
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Use of a piezoelectric surgical device to harvest bone grafts from the mandibular ramus: report of 40 cases.
    Happe A.
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2007 Jun 11; 27(3):241-9. PubMed ID: 17694947
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. [Clinical application of a self-developed bone collector in dental implantation].
    Ding X, Huang JJ, Zhu XH, Zhang XH, Chen H, Lin Z.
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2011 Apr 11; 46(4):230-2. PubMed ID: 21612713
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Viability of autogenous bone grafts obtained by using bone collectors: histological and microbiological study.
    Blay A, Tunchel S, Sendyk WR.
    Pesqui Odontol Bras; 2003 Apr 11; 17(3):234-40. PubMed ID: 14762501
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.