These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

601 related items for PubMed ID: 17977169

  • 1. Pap smears with reactive cellular changes: a prospective study.
    Ding DC, Hsu S, Chen SS, Hsu YH.
    J Reprod Med; 2007 Oct; 52(10):938-40. PubMed ID: 17977169
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Abnormal cervical cytology in pregnancy: a 17-year experience.
    Economos K, Perez Veridiano N, Delke I, Collado ML, Tancer ML.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Jun; 81(6):915-8. PubMed ID: 8497355
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Endocervical brush cytology. An alternative to endocervical curettage?
    Weitzman GA, Korhonen MO, Reeves KO, Irwin JF, Carter TS, Kaufman RH.
    J Reprod Med; 1988 Aug; 33(8):677-83. PubMed ID: 3172071
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. [Clinical significance of endocervical curettage (ECC) in predicting neoplastic lesions of the cervix].
    Toki T, Fujii S, Yajima A.
    Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1994 Mar; 46(3):265-70. PubMed ID: 8133138
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. The role of endocervical curettage in satisfactory colposcopy.
    el-Dabh A, Rogers RE, Davis TE, Sutton GP.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1989 Aug; 74(2):159-64. PubMed ID: 2748050
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Clinical and histological significance of atypical glandular cell on Pap smear.
    Behtash N, Nazari Z, Fakhrejahani F, Khafaf A, Azar EG.
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2007 Feb; 47(1):46-9. PubMed ID: 17261100
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Role of endocervical curettage in colposcopy.
    Hatch KD, Shingleton HM, Orr JW, Gore H, Soong SJ.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Mar; 65(3):403-8. PubMed ID: 3974966
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Colposcopic and histologic findings in women with a cytologic diagnosis of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance.
    Yarandi F, Izadi Mood N, Mirashrafi F, Eftekhar Z.
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2004 Dec; 44(6):514-6. PubMed ID: 15598287
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Colposcopic screening of women with atypical Papanicolaou smears.
    Kohan S, Noumoff J, Beckman EM, Morris M, Weiner E, Douglas GW.
    J Reprod Med; 1985 May; 30(5):383-7. PubMed ID: 4009560
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Endocervical curettage as a routine part of colposcopic examinations for abnormal cervical cytology.
    Saltzman DH, Evans MI, Warsof SL, Friedman AJ.
    J Reprod Med; 1985 Nov; 30(11):871-3. PubMed ID: 4078822
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. The role of endocervical curettage in the management of patients with abnormal cervical cytology.
    Khademol-Reza L, Magrina JF, Litton N.
    Mo Med; 1986 Apr; 83(4):219-22. PubMed ID: 3507592
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Necessity for endocervical curettage in elderly women undergoing colposcopy.
    Dinh TA, Dinh TV, Hannigan EV, Yandell RB, Dillard EA.
    J Reprod Med; 1989 Sep; 34(9):621-4. PubMed ID: 2810244
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. [Colposcopic-histologic results in 97 patients with mild dysplasia shown by Pap test].
    Crescini C, Pezzica E, Artuso A, Comerio D, Reale D, Bonaldi A.
    Minerva Ginecol; 1991 Nov; 43(11):509-12. PubMed ID: 1784407
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. The value of endocervical curettage as part of the standard colposcopic evaluation.
    Granai CO, Jelen I, Louis F, Kawada CY, Curry SL.
    J Reprod Med; 1985 May; 30(5):373-5. PubMed ID: 4009557
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Cervical conization findings in women with dysplastic cervical cytology and normal colposcopy.
    Ramirez EJ, Hernandez E, Miyazawa K.
    J Reprod Med; 1990 Apr; 35(4):359-61. PubMed ID: 2352226
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Progression of 189 women diagnosed with uterine cervical dysplasia based on abnormal results in mass screening.
    Muramatsu T, Yoshitake T, Iida T, Yamashita E, Hirasawa T, Miyamoto T, Murakami M, Matsui N, Kajiwara H, Yasuda M, Osamura RY, Mikami M.
    Tokai J Exp Clin Med; 2006 Dec 20; 31(4):141-5. PubMed ID: 21302243
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. A critical evaluation of the endocervical curettage.
    Spirtos NM, Schlaerth JB, d'Ablaing G, Morrow CP.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Nov 20; 70(5):729-33. PubMed ID: 3658281
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Microcolposcopy vs. cone histology in evaluation of the endocervix in women with inadequate colposcopy or positive endocervical curettage.
    Hunter V, Tseng P.
    J Reprod Med; 1989 Sep 20; 34(9):625-8. PubMed ID: 2810245
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Effect of cervical disease history on outcomes of women who have a pap diagnosis of atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance.
    Raab SS, Bishop NS, Zaleski MS.
    Gynecol Oncol; 1999 Sep 20; 74(3):460-4. PubMed ID: 10479510
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Atypical squamous cells in Papanicolaou smears.
    Davis GL, Hernandez E, Davis JL, Miyazawa K.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Jan 20; 69(1):43-6. PubMed ID: 3540762
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 31.