These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

656 related items for PubMed ID: 17977193

  • 1. Percutaneous multilevel decompressive laminectomy, foraminotomy, and instrumented fusion for cervical spondylotic radiculopathy and myelopathy: assessment of feasibility and surgical technique.
    Scheufler KM, Kirsch E.
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2007 Nov; 7(5):514-20. PubMed ID: 17977193
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Short Form-36 outcomes following focal 1- and 2-level cervical laminectomy with multilevel instrumented fusion.
    Epstein NE, Epstein JA.
    Surg Neurol; 2006 Sep; 66(3):264-8; discussion 268. PubMed ID: 16935631
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. [Comparison of effectiveness between laminoplasty and laminectomy decompression and fusion with internal fixation for cervical spondylotic myelopathy].
    Zhang H, Sun T, Lu S, Li Q, Yadav SK.
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Oct; 26(10):1191-6. PubMed ID: 23167101
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Skip laminectomy--a new treatment for cervical spondylotic myelopathy, preserving bilateral muscular attachments to the spinous processes: a preliminary report.
    Shiraishi T.
    Spine J; 2002 Oct; 2(2):108-15. PubMed ID: 14588269
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Laminoplasty versus laminectomy and fusion for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy.
    Woods BI, Hohl J, Lee J, Donaldson W, Kang J.
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2011 Mar; 469(3):688-95. PubMed ID: 21089002
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Minimally invasive cervical spine foraminotomy and lateral mass screw placement.
    Mikhael MM, Celestre PC, Wolf CF, Mroz TE, Wang JC.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Mar 01; 37(5):E318-22. PubMed ID: 22024895
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Percutaneous posterior cervical fusion with the DTRAX Facet System for single-level radiculopathy: results in 60 patients.
    McCormack BM, Bundoc RC, Ver MR, Ignacio JM, Berven SH, Eyster EF.
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Mar 01; 18(3):245-54. PubMed ID: 23330952
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Operative treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy and radiculopathy. A comparison of laminectomy and laminoplasty at five year average follow-up.
    Kaminsky SB, Clark CR, Traynelis VC.
    Iowa Orthop J; 2004 Mar 01; 24():95-105. PubMed ID: 15296214
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. An analysis of factors causing poor surgical outcome in patients with cervical myelopathy due to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: anterior decompression with spinal fusion versus laminoplasty.
    Masaki Y, Yamazaki M, Okawa A, Aramomi M, Hashimoto M, Koda M, Mochizuki M, Moriya H.
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2007 Feb 01; 20(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 17285045
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. [Microsurgical anterior cervical foraminotomy in spondylogenous cervical radiculopathy].
    Grigorian IuA, Stepanian MA, Onopchenko EV, Kadin LA, Khimochko EB, Lunina ES.
    Zh Vopr Neirokhir Im N N Burdenko; 2008 Feb 01; (2):31-5; discussion 35. PubMed ID: 18720729
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 33.