These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

182 related items for PubMed ID: 17977813

  • 1. Load distribution in the healthy and osteoporotic human proximal femur during a fall to the side.
    Verhulp E, van Rietbergen B, Huiskes R.
    Bone; 2008 Jan; 42(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 17977813
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Computational simulation of simultaneous cortical and trabecular bone change in human proximal femur during bone remodeling.
    Jang IG, Kim IY.
    J Biomech; 2010 Jan 19; 43(2):294-301. PubMed ID: 19762027
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Evaluation of damage to trabecular bone of the osteoporotic human acetabulum at small strains using nonlinear micro-finite element analyses.
    Ding H, Zhu ZA, Dai KR.
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2009 Sep 05; 122(17):2041-7. PubMed ID: 19781393
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Contribution of inter-site variations in architecture to trabecular bone apparent yield strains.
    Morgan EF, Bayraktar HH, Yeh OC, Majumdar S, Burghardt A, Keaveny TM.
    J Biomech; 2004 Sep 05; 37(9):1413-20. PubMed ID: 15275849
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Effect of local density changes on the failure load of the proximal femur.
    Oden ZM, Selvitelli DM, Bouxsein ML.
    J Orthop Res; 1999 Sep 05; 17(5):661-7. PubMed ID: 10569474
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. The osteoporotic vertebral structure is well adapted to the loads of daily life, but not to infrequent "error" loads.
    Homminga J, Van-Rietbergen B, Lochmüller EM, Weinans H, Eckstein F, Huiskes R.
    Bone; 2004 Mar 05; 34(3):510-6. PubMed ID: 15003798
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Contribution of muscular weakness to osteoporosis: computational and animal models.
    Be'ery-Lipperman M, Gefen A.
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2005 Nov 05; 20(9):984-97. PubMed ID: 16039022
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Comparison of micro-level and continuum-level voxel models of the proximal femur.
    Verhulp E, van Rietbergen B, Huiskes R.
    J Biomech; 2006 Nov 05; 39(16):2951-7. PubMed ID: 16359680
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Reproducibility and side differences of mechanical tests for determining the structural strength of the proximal femur.
    Eckstein F, Wunderer C, Boehm H, Kuhn V, Priemel M, Link TM, Lochmüller EM.
    J Bone Miner Res; 2004 Mar 05; 19(3):379-85. PubMed ID: 15040825
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Bone density, strength, and formation in adult cathepsin K (-/-) mice.
    Pennypacker B, Shea M, Liu Q, Masarachia P, Saftig P, Rodan S, Rodan G, Kimmel D.
    Bone; 2009 Feb 05; 44(2):199-207. PubMed ID: 18845279
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.