These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

132 related items for PubMed ID: 17978949

  • 1. Transient evoked otoacoustic emission input-output function variation in a large sample of neonates and implications for hearing screening.
    How J, Lutman ME.
    Int J Audiol; 2007 Nov; 46(11):670-9. PubMed ID: 17978949
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Neonatal hearing screening: evaluation of tone-burst and click-evoked otoacoustic emission test criteria.
    McPherson B, Li SF, Shi BX, Tang JL, Wong BY.
    Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):256-62. PubMed ID: 16672794
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Changes in transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions in the first month of life.
    Prieve BA, Hancur-Bucci CA, Preston JL.
    Ear Hear; 2009 Jun; 30(3):330-9. PubMed ID: 19322090
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Changes in transient-evoked otoacoustic emission levels with negative tympanometric peak pressure in infants and toddlers.
    Prieve BA, Calandruccio L, Fitzgerald T, Mazevski A, Georgantas LM.
    Ear Hear; 2008 Aug; 29(4):533-42. PubMed ID: 18469719
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions in a group of professional singers who have normal pure-tone hearing thresholds.
    Hamdan AL, Abouchacra KS, Zeki Al Hazzouri AG, Zaytoun G.
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):360-77. PubMed ID: 18382377
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Evoked otoacoustic emissions: nonlinearities and response interpretation.
    Ravazzani P, Grandori F.
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1993 May; 40(5):500-4. PubMed ID: 8225340
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Reliability of hearing screening in high-risk neonates: comparative study of otoacoustic emission, automated and conventional auditory brainstem response.
    Suppiej A, Rizzardi E, Zanardo V, Franzoi M, Ermani M, Orzan E.
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Apr; 118(4):869-76. PubMed ID: 17317296
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Otoacoustic emissions in neonates measured with different acquisition protocols.
    Jedrzejczak WW, Hatzopoulos S, Sliwa L, Pilka E, Kochanek K, Skarzynski H.
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2012 Mar; 76(3):382-7. PubMed ID: 22266169
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. [Results of neonatal hearing screening with transitory evoked otoacoustic emissions].
    Sitka U, Rasinski C, Gall V.
    Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol; 1995 Mar; 199(2):71-7. PubMed ID: 7788581
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Characteristics of normal newborn transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions: ear asymmetries and sex effects.
    Berninger E.
    Int J Audiol; 2007 Nov; 46(11):661-9. PubMed ID: 17978948
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. A bispectral approach to analyze nonlinear cochlear active mechanisms in transient evoked otoacoustic emissions.
    Marchesi S, Tognola G, Paglialonga A.
    IEEE Trans Biomed Circuits Syst; 2013 Aug; 7(4):401-13. PubMed ID: 23893200
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. [Incidence of hypoacusia secondary to hyperbilirubinaemia in a universal neonatal auditory screening programme based on otoacoustic emissions and evoked auditory potentials].
    Núñez-Batalla F, Carro-Fernández P, Antuña-León ME, González-Trelles T.
    Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp; 2008 Mar; 59(3):108-13. PubMed ID: 18364202
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Sensitivity and specificity of portable transient otoacoustic emission (TEOAE) in newborn hearing screening.
    Abdullah A, Long CW, Saim L, Mukari SZ.
    Med J Malaysia; 2005 Mar; 60(1):21-7. PubMed ID: 16250276
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Comparison of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions and distortion product otoacoustic emissions when screening hearing in preschool children in a community setting.
    Dille M, Glattke TJ, Earl BR.
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2007 Nov; 71(11):1789-95. PubMed ID: 17870187
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. The effect of the number of averaged responses on the measurement of transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions in newborns.
    Korres SG, Balatsouras DG, Nikolopoulos T, Korres GS, Economou NC, Ferekidis E.
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2006 Mar; 70(3):429-33. PubMed ID: 16140396
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Analysis of measurements from the first Swedish universal neonatal hearing screening program.
    Hergils L.
    Int J Audiol; 2007 Nov; 46(11):680-5. PubMed ID: 17978950
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Wavelet and matching pursuit estimates of the transient-evoked otoacoustic emission latency.
    Notaro G, Al-Maamury AM, Moleti A, Sisto R.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Dec; 122(6):3576-85. PubMed ID: 18247765
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in hearing screening programs: protocol for developing countries.
    Bansal S, Gupta A, Nagarkar A.
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2008 Jul; 72(7):1059-63. PubMed ID: 18479757
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.