These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


217 related items for PubMed ID: 17980186

  • 1. Accuracy of a single fetal weight estimation at 29-34 weeks in diabetic pregnancies: can it predict large-for-gestational-age infants at term?
    Ben-Haroush A, Chen R, Hadar E, Hod M, Yogev Y.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Nov; 197(5):497.e1-6. PubMed ID: 17980186
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Prediction of large-for-gestational-age neonate by routine third-trimester ultrasound.
    Khan N, Ciobanu A, Karampitsakos T, Akolekar R, Nicolaides KH.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Sep; 54(3):326-333. PubMed ID: 31236963
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Fetal magnetic resonance imaging at 36 weeks predicts neonatal macrosomia: the PREMACRO study.
    Kadji C, Cannie MM, Kang X, Carlin A, Benjou Etchoua S, Resta S, Dütemeyer V, Abi-Khalil F, Mazzone E, Bevilacqua E, Jani JC.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Feb; 226(2):238.e1-238.e12. PubMed ID: 34358479
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Predictive value of a single early fetal weight estimate in normal pregnancies.
    Ben-Haroush A, Yogev Y, Hod M, Bar J.
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2007 Feb; 130(2):187-92. PubMed ID: 16720074
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Sonographic estimation of fetal weight in macrosomic fetuses: diabetic versus non-diabetic pregnancies.
    Wong SF, Chan FY, Cincotta RB, Oats JJ, McIntyre HD.
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2001 Nov; 41(4):429-32. PubMed ID: 11787919
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Prediction of birthweight and risk of macrosomia in pregnancies complicated by diabetes.
    Shulman Y, Shah BR, Berger H, Yoon EW, Helpaerin I, Mei-Dan E, Aviram A, Retnakaran R, Melamed N.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2023 Aug; 5(8):101042. PubMed ID: 37286100
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Accuracy of ultrasound estimated fetal weight formulae to predict actual birthweight after 34 weeks: prospective validation study.
    Kumarasiri S, Wanigasekara R, Wahalawatta L, Jayasinghe L, Padeniya T, Dias T.
    Ceylon Med J; 2013 Sep; 58(3):116-21. PubMed ID: 24081172
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. First and third trimester ultrasound in the prediction of birthweight discordance in dichorionic twins.
    Banks CL, Nelson SM, Owen P.
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2008 May; 138(1):34-8. PubMed ID: 17897772
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Comparison of estimated fetal weight percentiles near term for predicting extremes of birthweight percentile.
    Sovio U, Smith GCS.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Mar; 224(3):292.e1-292.e19. PubMed ID: 32835717
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Fetal weight estimation in gestational diabetic pregnancies: comparison between conventional and three-dimensional fractional thigh volume methods using gestation-adjusted projection.
    Pagani G, Palai N, Zatti S, Fratelli N, Prefumo F, Frusca T.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Jan; 43(1):72-6. PubMed ID: 23494762
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Fetal growth velocity: the NICHD fetal growth studies.
    Grantz KL, Kim S, Grobman WA, Newman R, Owen J, Skupski D, Grewal J, Chien EK, Wing DA, Wapner RJ, Ranzini AC, Nageotte MP, Hinkle SN, Pugh S, Li H, Fuchs K, Hediger M, Buck Louis GM, Albert PS.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Sep; 219(3):285.e1-285.e36. PubMed ID: 29803819
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Sonographic EFW and macrosomia: is there an optimum formula to predict diabetic fetal macrosomia?
    Combs CA, Rosenn B, Miodovnik M, Siddiqi TA.
    J Matern Fetal Med; 2000 Sep; 9(1):55-61. PubMed ID: 10757437
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Reliability of ultrasound estimation of fetal weight in term singleton pregnancies.
    Colman A, Maharaj D, Hutton J, Tuohy J.
    N Z Med J; 2006 Sep 08; 119(1241):U2146. PubMed ID: 16964298
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Accuracy of sonographic estimation of fetal weight before induction of labor in diabetic pregnancies and pregnancies with suspected fetal macrosomia.
    Ben-Haroush A, Yogev Y, Mashiach R, Hod M, Meisner I.
    J Perinat Med; 2003 Sep 08; 31(3):225-30. PubMed ID: 12825478
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Antenatal prediction of fetal macrosomia in pregnancies affected by maternal pre-gestational diabetes.
    O'Dwyer V, Russell NM, McDonnell B, Sharkey L, Mulcahy C, Higgins MF.
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2022 Dec 08; 35(25):7412-7416. PubMed ID: 34229553
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Prediction of fetal macrosomia using two-dimensional and three-dimensional ultrasound.
    Mazzone E, Dall'Asta A, Kiener AJO, Carpano MG, Suprani A, Ghi T, Frusca T.
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2019 Dec 08; 243():26-31. PubMed ID: 31670065
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Value of a single early third trimester fetal biometry for the prediction of birth weight deviations in a low risk population.
    De Reu PA, Smits LJ, Oosterbaan HP, Nijhuis JG.
    J Perinat Med; 2008 Dec 08; 36(4):324-9. PubMed ID: 18598122
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. A prospective pilot study in assessing the accuracy of ultrasound estimated fetal weight prior to delivery.
    Sekar R, Khatun M, Barrett HL, Duncombe G.
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2016 Feb 08; 56(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 26299881
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Prediction of large-for-gestational age at 36 weeks' gestation: two-dimensional ultrasound vs three-dimensional ultrasound vs magnetic resonance imaging.
    Mazzone E, Kadji C, Cannie MM, Badr DA, Jani JC.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2024 Apr 08; 63(4):489-496. PubMed ID: 37725758
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Ultrasound diagnosis of fetal macrosomia: a comparison of weight prediction models using computer simulation.
    Mongelli M, Benzie R.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Oct 08; 26(5):500-3. PubMed ID: 16180258
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.