These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

979 related items for PubMed ID: 17982373

  • 1. Phonological mismatch makes aided speech recognition in noise cognitively taxing.
    Rudner M, Foo C, Rönnberg J, Lunner T.
    Ear Hear; 2007 Dec; 28(6):879-92. PubMed ID: 17982373
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Cognition and aided speech recognition in noise: specific role for cognitive factors following nine-week experience with adjusted compression settings in hearing aids.
    Rudner M, Foo C, Rönnberg J, Lunner T.
    Scand J Psychol; 2009 Oct; 50(5):405-18. PubMed ID: 19778388
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Phonological mismatch and explicit cognitive processing in a sample of 102 hearing-aid users.
    Rudner M, Foo C, Sundewall-Thorén E, Lunner T, Rönnberg J.
    Int J Audiol; 2008 Nov; 47 Suppl 2():S91-8. PubMed ID: 19012116
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study.
    Morera C, Manrique M, Ramos A, Garcia-Ibanez L, Cavalle L, Huarte A, Castillo C, Estrada E.
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Dynamic relation between working memory capacity and speech recognition in noise during the first 6 months of hearing aid use.
    Ng EH, Classon E, Larsby B, Arlinger S, Lunner T, Rudner M, Rönnberg J.
    Trends Hear; 2014 Nov 23; 18():. PubMed ID: 25421088
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Musician enhancement for speech-in-noise.
    Parbery-Clark A, Skoe E, Lam C, Kraus N.
    Ear Hear; 2009 Dec 23; 30(6):653-61. PubMed ID: 19734788
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Effects of noise source configuration on directional benefit using symmetric and asymmetric directional hearing aid fittings.
    Hornsby BW, Ricketts TA.
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr 23; 28(2):177-86. PubMed ID: 17496669
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Cognition counts: a working memory system for ease of language understanding (ELU).
    Rönnberg J, Rudner M, Foo C, Lunner T.
    Int J Audiol; 2008 Nov 23; 47 Suppl 2():S99-105. PubMed ID: 19012117
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Establishment of age-specific normative data for the canadian French version of the hearing in noise test for children.
    Vaillancourt V, Laroche C, Giguère C, Soli SD.
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun 23; 29(3):453-66. PubMed ID: 18349705
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Acclimatization to hearing aids.
    Dawes P, Munro KJ, Kalluri S, Edwards B.
    Ear Hear; 2014 Jun 23; 35(2):203-12. PubMed ID: 24351612
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. [Vibrant Sound Bridge System. A new kind hearing prosthesis for patients with sensorineural hearing loss. 2. Audiological results].
    Lenarz T, Weber BP, Issing PR, Gnadeberg D, Ambjørnsen K, Mack KF, Winter M.
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2001 Jul 23; 80(7):370-80. PubMed ID: 11488147
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. The influence of age, hearing, and working memory on the speech comprehension benefit derived from an automatic speech recognition system.
    Zekveld AA, Kramer SE, Kessens JM, Vlaming MS, Houtgast T.
    Ear Hear; 2009 Apr 23; 30(2):262-72. PubMed ID: 19194286
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. The design and evaluation of a hearing aid with trainable amplification parameters.
    Zakis JA, Dillon H, McDermott HJ.
    Ear Hear; 2007 Dec 23; 28(6):812-30. PubMed ID: 17982368
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. A Swedish version of the Hearing In Noise Test (HINT) for measurement of speech recognition.
    Hällgren M, Larsby B, Arlinger S.
    Int J Audiol; 2006 Apr 23; 45(4):227-37. PubMed ID: 16684704
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Subjective and objective effects of fast and slow compression on the perception of reverberant speech in listeners with hearing loss.
    Shi LF, Doherty KA.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2008 Oct 23; 51(5):1328-40. PubMed ID: 18664685
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Speech-reception threshold in noise for hearing-impaired listeners in conditions with a varying amplitude-frequency response.
    van Dijkhuizen JN, Festen JM, Plomp R.
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1990 Oct 23; 469():202-6. PubMed ID: 2356728
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Do hearing loss and cognitive function modulate benefit from different binaural noise-reduction settings?
    Neher T, Grimm G, Hohmann V, Kollmeier B.
    Ear Hear; 2014 Oct 23; 35(3):e52-62. PubMed ID: 24351610
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. The Performance-Perceptual Test (PPT) and its relationship to aided reported handicap and hearing aid satisfaction.
    Saunders GH, Forsline A.
    Ear Hear; 2006 Jun 23; 27(3):229-42. PubMed ID: 16672792
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Some aspects of methodology in speech audiometry.
    Hagerman B.
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1984 Jun 23; 21():1-25. PubMed ID: 6589731
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners.
    Burk MH, Humes LE, Amos NE, Strauser LE.
    Ear Hear; 2006 Jun 23; 27(3):263-78. PubMed ID: 16672795
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 49.