These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

546 related items for PubMed ID: 17993577

  • 21. Comparing LEA numbers low vision book and Feinbloom visual acuity charts.
    Hardgrave N, Hatley J, Lewerenz D.
    Optom Vis Sci; 2012 Nov; 89(11):1611-8. PubMed ID: 23026789
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. The logMAR Kay picture test and the logMAR acuity test: a comparative study.
    Elliott MC, Firth AY.
    Eye (Lond); 2009 Jan; 23(1):85-8. PubMed ID: 17901881
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Comparison of applicability of different visual acuity charts for pediatric outpatient visual tests.
    Fang H, Diao H, Chen L, Zeng J.
    Eye Sci; 2014 Jun; 29(2):90-4. PubMed ID: 26011958
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Efficacy of a remote based computerised visual acuity measurement.
    Srinivasan K, Ramesh SV, Babu N, Sanker N, Ray A, Karuna SM.
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2012 Jul; 96(7):987-90. PubMed ID: 22539747
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Validation of an automated-ETDRS near and intermediate visual acuity measurement.
    Pang Y, Sparschu L, Nylin E.
    Clin Exp Optom; 2020 Sep; 103(5):663-667. PubMed ID: 31822041
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. [Visual acuity measured via the Freiburg visual acuity test (FVT), Bailey Lovie chart and Landolt Ring chart].
    Wesemann W.
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2002 Sep; 219(9):660-7. PubMed ID: 12410466
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. A customised portable LogMAR chart with adjustable chart illumination for use as a mass screening device in the rural population.
    Gouthaman M, Raman RP, Kadambi A, Padmajakumari R, Paul PG, Sharma T.
    J Postgrad Med; 2005 Sep; 51(2):112-4, discussion 115. PubMed ID: 16006702
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. The development of a "reduced logMAR" visual acuity chart for use in routine clinical practice.
    Rosser DA, Laidlaw DA, Murdoch IE.
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2001 Apr; 85(4):432-6. PubMed ID: 11264133
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Visual acuity scored by the letter-by-letter or probit methods has lower retest variability than the line assignment method.
    Vanden Bosch ME, Wall M.
    Eye (Lond); 1997 Apr; 11 ( Pt 3)():411-7. PubMed ID: 9373488
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Crowded letter and crowded picture logMAR acuity in children with amblyopia: a quantitative comparison.
    O'Boyle C, Chen SI, Little JA.
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2017 Apr; 101(4):457-461. PubMed ID: 27388249
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. An evaluation of the M&S technologies smart system II for visual acuity measurement in young visually-normal adults.
    McClenaghan N, Kimura A, Stark LR.
    Optom Vis Sci; 2007 Mar; 84(3):218-23. PubMed ID: 17435535
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Computer-based test to measure optimal visual acuity in age-related macular degeneration.
    González EG, Tarita-Nistor L, Markowitz SN, Steinbach MJ.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Oct; 48(10):4838-45. PubMed ID: 17898311
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. On the statistical reliability of letter-chart visual acuity measurements.
    Arditi A, Cagenello R.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1993 Jan; 34(1):120-9. PubMed ID: 8425819
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. [Landolt C and snellen e acuity: differences in strabismus amblyopia?].
    Becker R, Gräf M.
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2006 Jan; 223(1):24-8. PubMed ID: 16418930
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Visual acuities "hand motion" and "counting fingers" can be quantified with the freiburg visual acuity test.
    Schulze-Bonsel K, Feltgen N, Burau H, Hansen L, Bach M.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Mar; 47(3):1236-40. PubMed ID: 16505064
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Using the KM visual acuity chart for more reliable evaluation of amblyopia compared to the HVOT method.
    Moutakis K, Stigmar G, Hall-Lindberg J.
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2004 Oct; 82(5):547-51. PubMed ID: 15453851
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. A modified ETDRS visual acuity chart for European-wide use.
    Plainis S, Tzatzala P, Orphanos Y, Tsilimbaris MK.
    Optom Vis Sci; 2007 Jul; 84(7):647-53. PubMed ID: 17632314
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Development and Validation of a Smartphone-Based Visual Acuity Test (Peek Acuity) for Clinical Practice and Community-Based Fieldwork.
    Bastawrous A, Rono HK, Livingstone IA, Weiss HA, Jordan S, Kuper H, Burton MJ.
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2015 Aug; 133(8):930-7. PubMed ID: 26022921
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Repeatability of the Waterloo Four-Contrast LogMAR Visual Acuity chart and Near Vision Test card on a group of normal young adults.
    Cho P, Woo GC.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2004 Sep; 24(5):427-35. PubMed ID: 15315657
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. ETDRS-fast: implementing psychophysical adaptive methods to standardized visual acuity measurement with ETDRS charts.
    Camparini M, Cassinari P, Ferrigno L, Macaluso C.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2001 May; 42(6):1226-31. PubMed ID: 11328731
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 28.