These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

898 related items for PubMed ID: 1799858

  • 21. Initial clinical results with a new needle screen storage phosphor system in chest radiograms.
    Körner M, Wirth S, Treitl M, Reiser M, Pfeifer KJ.
    Rofo; 2005 Nov; 177(11):1491-6. PubMed ID: 16302129
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Digital chest radiography with a large image intensifier. Evaluation of diagnostic performance and patient exposure.
    Månsson LG, Kheddache S, Schlossman D, Börjesson J, Håkansson E, Mattsson S, Tylén U.
    Acta Radiol; 1989 Nov; 30(4):337-42. PubMed ID: 2775592
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Computed and conventional chest radiography: a comparison of image quality and radiation dose.
    Ramli K, Abdullah BJ, Ng KH, Mahmud R, Hussain AF.
    Australas Radiol; 2005 Dec; 49(6):460-6. PubMed ID: 16351609
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Chest image quality: film-screen vs. computed radiography.
    Freedman M.
    Adm Radiol; 1991 Jul; 10(7):38-40, 42. PubMed ID: 10170769
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. [Thoracic radiographs with the AMBER system. A comparison of the diagnostic image quality of film-screen and storage-phosphor radiographs on the grid-partition stand and the AMBER system].
    Busch HP, Hartmann J, Freund MC, Lehmann KJ, Georgi M, Richter K.
    Rofo; 1992 Mar; 156(3):241-6. PubMed ID: 1550921
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Digital slot-scan charge-coupled device radiography versus AMBER and Bucky screen-film radiography: comparison of image quality in a phantom study.
    Veldkamp WJ, Kroft LJ, Mertens BJ, Geleijns J.
    Radiology; 2005 Jun; 235(3):857-66. PubMed ID: 15845787
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Chest radiography: a comparison of image quality and effective dose using four digital systems.
    Pascoal A, Lawinski CP, Mackenzie A, Tabakov S, Lewis CA.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005 Jun; 114(1-3):273-7. PubMed ID: 15933121
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Image enhancement using computed radiography.
    Long BW.
    Radiol Technol; 1990 Jun; 61(4):276-80. PubMed ID: 2326438
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Selenium-based digital radiography of the chest: radiologists' preference compared with film-screen radiographs.
    Floyd CE, Baker JA, Chotas HG, Delong DM, Ravin CE.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Dec; 165(6):1353-8. PubMed ID: 7484562
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. [ROC analysis in post-processing of image data in digital thoracic radiography].
    Müller RD, Hirche H, Voss M, Buddenbrock B, John V, Gocke P.
    Rofo; 1995 Feb; 162(2):163-9. PubMed ID: 7881085
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 45.