These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

126 related items for PubMed ID: 1800696

  • 1. Parapulpal pins and their effects on the fracture resistance of pin-retained cores.
    Haller B, Götze W, Weiss G.
    J Oral Rehabil; 1991 Sep; 18(5):459-69. PubMed ID: 1800696
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Fracture resistance of five pin-retained core build-up materials on teeth with and without extracoronal preparation.
    Burke FJ, Shaglouf AG, Combe EC, Wilson NH.
    Oper Dent; 2000 Sep; 25(5):388-94. PubMed ID: 11203847
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Fracture resistance of four core materials with incorporated pins.
    Kao EC, Hart S, Johnston WM.
    Int J Prosthodont; 1989 Sep; 2(6):569-78. PubMed ID: 2701071
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Effect of parapulpal pins on conservative restoration of pulpless premolars.
    Eli I, Deutsch-Zelevitch E, Gelerenter I, Liberman R.
    J Prosthet Dent; 1994 Dec; 72(6):577-81. PubMed ID: 7853252
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Direct core materials.
    Wilson PH, Fisher NL, Bartlett DW.
    Dent Update; 2003 Sep; 30(7):362-8. PubMed ID: 14558201
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Retention of core composites, glass ionomers, and cermets by a self-threading dentin pin: the influence of fracture toughness upon failure.
    Lloyd CH, Butchart DG.
    Dent Mater; 1990 Jul; 6(3):185-8. PubMed ID: 2086292
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Fracture resistance of amalgam and composite resin cores retained by various intradentinal retentive features.
    Tjan AH, Dunn JR, Lee JK.
    Quintessence Int; 1993 Mar; 24(3):211-7. PubMed ID: 8511280
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. A study of the fracture resistance of nyyar cores of three restorative materials.
    Ferrier S, Sekhon BS, Brunton PA.
    Oper Dent; 2008 Mar; 33(3):305-11. PubMed ID: 18505221
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Are dentine pins obsolete?
    Bonsor SJ.
    Dent Update; 2013 May; 40(4):253-4, 256-8. PubMed ID: 23829005
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Direct cores for vital teeth--materials and methods used to retain cores in vital teeth.
    Wilson PH, Fisher NL, Bartlett DW.
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2002 Dec; 10(4):157-62. PubMed ID: 12526272
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. A comparison of strengths of five core and post-and-core systems.
    Möllersten L, Lockowandt P, Lindén LA.
    Quintessence Int; 2002 Feb; 33(2):140-9. PubMed ID: 11890028
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. A comparative study of the bond strengths of amalgam and alloy-glass ionomer cores.
    Arcoria CJ, DeWald JP, Moody CR, Ferracane JL.
    J Oral Rehabil; 1989 May; 16(3):301-7. PubMed ID: 2664111
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Replacement of missing cusps: an in vitro study.
    Macpherson LC, Smith BG.
    J Dent; 1994 Apr; 22(2):118-20. PubMed ID: 8195477
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. The performance of bonded vs. pin-retained complex amalgam restorations: a five-year clinical evaluation.
    Summitt JB, Burgess JO, Berry TG, Robbins JW, Osborne JW, Haveman CW.
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2001 Jul; 132(7):923-31. PubMed ID: 11480646
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.