These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

168 related items for PubMed ID: 1800729

  • 1. Fracture durability of restored functional cusps on maxillary nonvital premolar teeth.
    Ulusoy N, Nayyar A, Morris CF, Fairhurst CW.
    J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Sep; 66(3):330-5. PubMed ID: 1800729
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Fracture resistance of teeth with Class 2 silver amalgam, posterior composite, and glass cermet restorations.
    Jagadish S, Yogesh BG.
    Oper Dent; 1990 Sep; 15(2):42-7. PubMed ID: 2374743
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Fracture resistance of root filled premolar teeth restored with direct composite resin with or without cusp coverage.
    Xie KX, Wang XY, Gao XJ, Yuan CY, Li JX, Chu CH.
    Int Endod J; 2012 Jun; 45(6):524-9. PubMed ID: 22242600
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Influence of coronal restorations on the fracture resistance of root canal-treated premolar and molar teeth: a retrospective study.
    Dammaschke T, Nykiel K, Sagheri D, Schäfer E.
    Aust Endod J; 2013 Aug; 39(2):48-56. PubMed ID: 23890259
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with combined composite-amalgam restorations.
    Geiger S, Paikin L, Gorfil C, Gordon M.
    Quintessence Int; 2008 Feb; 39(2):e58-62. PubMed ID: 18560642
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Influence of different transitional restorations on the fracture resistance of premolar teeth.
    Qualtrough AJ, Cawte SG, Wilson NH.
    Oper Dent; 2001 Feb; 26(3):267-72. PubMed ID: 11357569
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Bonded amalgam restorations: using a glass-ionomer as an adhesive liner.
    Chen RS, Liu CC, Cheng MR, Lin CP.
    Oper Dent; 2000 Feb; 25(5):411-7. PubMed ID: 11203849
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Influence of restorative technique on the biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated maxillary premolars. Part I: fracture resistance and fracture mode.
    Soares PV, Santos-Filho PC, Martins LR, Soares CJ.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Jan; 99(1):30-7. PubMed ID: 18182183
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. A comparative evaluation of fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth, with variable marginal ridge thicknesses, restored with composite resin and composite resin reinforced with Ribbond: an in vitro study.
    Kalburge V, Yakub SS, Kalburge J, Hiremath H, Chandurkar A.
    Indian J Dent Res; 2013 Jan; 24(2):193-8. PubMed ID: 23965445
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Amalgam, composite resin and glass ionomer cement in Class II restorations in primary molars--a three year clinical evaluation.
    Ostlund J, Möller K, Koch G.
    Swed Dent J; 1992 Jan; 16(3):81-6. PubMed ID: 1496459
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. The effect of different restoration techniques on the fracture resistance of endodontically-treated molars.
    Cobankara FK, Unlu N, Cetin AR, Ozkan HB.
    Oper Dent; 2008 Jan; 33(5):526-33. PubMed ID: 18833859
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Effect of restoration method on fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars.
    Yamada Y, Tsubota Y, Fukushima S.
    Int J Prosthodont; 2004 Jan; 17(1):94-8. PubMed ID: 15008239
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Effect of bulk-fill base material on fracture strength of root-filled teeth restored with laminate resin composite restorations.
    Taha NA, Maghaireh GA, Ghannam AS, Palamara JE.
    J Dent; 2017 Aug; 63():60-64. PubMed ID: 28571830
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. An in vitro Evaluation of Fracture Resistance of endodontically treated Teeth with Different Restorative Materials.
    Sangwan B, Rishi R, Seal M, Jain K, Dutt P, Talukdar P.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Jul 01; 17(7):549-52. PubMed ID: 27595720
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Effect of restored and unrestored non-carious cervical lesions on the fracture resistance of previously restored maxillary premolar teeth.
    Osborne-Smith KL, Burke FJ, Farlane TM, Wilson NH.
    J Dent; 1998 Jul 01; 26(5-6):427-33. PubMed ID: 9699433
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Effect of fiber post and cusp coverage on fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars directly restored with composite resin.
    Mohammadi N, Kahnamoii MA, Yeganeh PK, Navimipour EJ.
    J Endod; 2009 Oct 01; 35(10):1428-32. PubMed ID: 19801245
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.