These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

310 related items for PubMed ID: 18021577

  • 1. Evaluation of diagnostic tests when there is no gold standard. A review of methods.
    Rutjes AW, Reitsma JB, Coomarasamy A, Khan KS, Bossuyt PM.
    Health Technol Assess; 2007 Dec; 11(50):iii, ix-51. PubMed ID: 18021577
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. A review of solutions for diagnostic accuracy studies with an imperfect or missing reference standard.
    Reitsma JB, Rutjes AW, Khan KS, Coomarasamy A, Bossuyt PM.
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Aug; 62(8):797-806. PubMed ID: 19447581
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Diagnostic test accuracy of nutritional tools used to identify undernutrition in patients with colorectal cancer: a systematic review.
    Håkonsen SJ, Pedersen PU, Bath-Hextall F, Kirkpatrick P.
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 May 15; 13(4):141-87. PubMed ID: 26447079
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Estimating diagnostic accuracy without a gold standard: A continued controversy.
    Collins J, Albert PS.
    J Biopharm Stat; 2016 May 15; 26(6):1078-1082. PubMed ID: 27548004
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Diagnostic test evaluation methodology: A systematic review of methods employed to evaluate diagnostic tests in the absence of gold standard - An update.
    Umemneku Chikere CM, Wilson K, Graziadio S, Vale L, Allen AJ.
    PLoS One; 2019 May 15; 14(10):e0223832. PubMed ID: 31603953
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. The measurement and monitoring of surgical adverse events.
    Bruce J, Russell EM, Mollison J, Krukowski ZH.
    Health Technol Assess; 2001 May 15; 5(22):1-194. PubMed ID: 11532239
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Fuzzy gold standards: Approaches to handling an imperfect reference standard.
    Walsh T.
    J Dent; 2018 Jul 15; 74 Suppl 1():S47-S49. PubMed ID: 29929589
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Systematic review and evaluation of methods of assessing urinary incontinence.
    Martin JL, Williams KS, Abrams KR, Turner DA, Sutton AJ, Chapple C, Assassa RP, Shaw C, Cheater F.
    Health Technol Assess; 2006 Feb 15; 10(6):1-132, iii-iv. PubMed ID: 16487456
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Estimating diagnostic accuracy of multiple binary tests with an imperfect reference standard.
    Albert PS.
    Stat Med; 2009 Feb 28; 28(5):780-97. PubMed ID: 19101935
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Response to letter to the editor from Dr Rahman Shiri: The challenging topic of suicide across occupational groups.
    Niedhammer I, Milner A, Witt K, Klingelschmidt J, Khireddine-Medouni I, Alexopoulos EC, Toivanen S, Chastang JF, LaMontagne AD.
    Scand J Work Environ Health; 2018 Jan 01; 44(1):108-110. PubMed ID: 29218357
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Avoiding and identifying errors in health technology assessment models: qualitative study and methodological review.
    Chilcott J, Tappenden P, Rawdin A, Johnson M, Kaltenthaler E, Paisley S, Papaioannou D, Shippam A.
    Health Technol Assess; 2010 May 01; 14(25):iii-iv, ix-xii, 1-107. PubMed ID: 20501062
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Different latent class models were used and evaluated for assessing the accuracy of campylobacter diagnostic tests: overcoming imperfect reference standards?
    Asselineau J, Paye A, Bessède E, Perez P, Proust-Lima C.
    Epidemiol Infect; 2018 Sep 01; 146(12):1556-1564. PubMed ID: 29945689
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Diagnostic test analyses in search of their gold standard: latent class analyses with random effects.
    Goetghebeur E, Liinev J, Boelaert M, Van der Stuyft P.
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2000 Jun 01; 9(3):231-48. PubMed ID: 11084706
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    Kobeissy FH, Wolahan SM, Hirt D, Glenn TC.
    ; 2015 Jun 01. PubMed ID: 26269925
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of technologies used to visualise the seizure focus in people with refractory epilepsy being considered for surgery: a systematic review and decision-analytical model.
    Burch J, Hinde S, Palmer S, Beyer F, Minton J, Marson A, Wieshmann U, Woolacott N, Soares M.
    Health Technol Assess; 2012 Jun 01; 16(34):1-157, iii-iv. PubMed ID: 22985954
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Scientific basis of the OCRA method for risk assessment of biomechanical overload of upper limb, as preferred method in ISO standards on biomechanical risk factors.
    Colombini D, Occhipinti E.
    Scand J Work Environ Health; 2018 Jul 01; 44(4):436-438. PubMed ID: 29961081
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Assessment of the accuracy of diagnostic tests: the cross-sectional study.
    Knottnerus JA, Muris JW.
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2003 Nov 01; 56(11):1118-28. PubMed ID: 14615003
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    Lux L, Boehlecke B, Lohr KN.
    ; 2004 09 01. PubMed ID: 26065047
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Glaucoma diagnostics.
    Geimer SA.
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2013 Feb 01; 91 Thesis 1():1-32. PubMed ID: 23384049
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 16.