These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
42. Audiological findings among workers from Brazilian small-scale fisheries. Paini MC, Morata TC, Corteletti LJ, Albizu E, Marques JM, Santos L. Ear Hear; 2009 Feb; 30(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 19050644 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. Frequency distribution of synchronized spontaneous otoacoustic emissions showing sex-dependent differences and asymmetry between ears in 2- to 4-day-old neonates. Liu J, Wang N, Li J, Shi B, Wang H. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2009 May; 73(5):731-6. PubMed ID: 19237204 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. Audiometric screening criteria: a field study. Tillis CH, Jancosek E. J Aud Res; 1977 Jan; 17(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 614334 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. [Vocal audiometric tests for children with infantile cerebral paralysis]. Di Nicola R, Salonna F. Clin Otorinolaringoiatr; 1965 Jan; 17(5):373-87. PubMed ID: 5869611 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. Audiometric Evaluation of Children with Hearing Loss. Singleton AJ, Waltzman SB. Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 2015 Dec; 48(6):891-901. PubMed ID: 26388609 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. [Quick-check audiometry in the ENT practice]. Spinar J. Cesk Otolaryngol; 1976 Oct; 25(5):300-4. PubMed ID: 1000683 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. An attempt at a mass audiometric screening program. Grunberg E. J Sch Health; 1969 Feb; 39(2):110-2. PubMed ID: 5190635 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. Questionnaire and interview in screening for hearing impairment in adults. Ito K, Naito R, Murofushi T, Iguchi R. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 2007 Dec; (559):24-8. PubMed ID: 18340557 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. An introduction to hearing loss and screening procedures for behavioral research. Reilly J, Troiani V, Grossman M, Wingfield A. Behav Res Methods; 2007 Aug; 39(3):667-72. PubMed ID: 17958180 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. Incidence of responses at the lower audiometric limits. Halpin C. Am J Audiol; 2007 Dec; 16(2):96-9. PubMed ID: 18056877 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. The Hearing Conservation Project in Kansas, U.S.A. Montgomery-Short RG. J Am Med Womens Assoc; 1967 Sep; 22(9):634-6. PubMed ID: 4228879 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. High frequency studies in school children in nine countries. Rosen S, Rosen HV. Laryngoscope; 1971 Jul; 81(7):1007-13. PubMed ID: 5561040 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. An innovation in insert visual reinforcement audiometry in children. Jayarajan V, Nandi R, Caldicott B. J Laryngol Otol; 2005 Feb; 119(2):132-3. PubMed ID: 15829066 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. Evaluation of noise-induced hearing loss with audiometer and distortion product otoacoustic emissions. Atchariyasathian V, Chayarpham S, Saekhow S. J Med Assoc Thai; 2008 Jul; 91(7):1066-71. PubMed ID: 18839846 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. [Our procedure in objective audiometry in the juvenile population]. Mencheta E, Núñez M, Uris J, Marco Algarra J. An Otorrinolaringol Ibero Am; 1983 Jul; 10(5):481-8. PubMed ID: 6650797 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. Audiometric patterns in ear disease. Fernández AO. Bol Asoc Med P R; 1969 Feb; 61(2):65-70. PubMed ID: 5253975 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. Auditory neuropathy: three cases among a group with sensorineural hearing loss. Mohd Khairi MD, Normastura AR, Wan Zaharah AW. Singapore Med J; 2009 Sep; 50(9):e324-5. PubMed ID: 19787161 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]