These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
150 related items for PubMed ID: 1803329
1. Retention and resistance provided by nine self-threading pins. Burgess JO, Summitt JB. Oper Dent; 1991; 16(2):55-60. PubMed ID: 1803329 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Fracture resistance of complex amalgam restorations. Burgess JO, Alvarez A, Summitt JB. Oper Dent; 1997; 22(3):128-32. PubMed ID: 9484151 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of resistance features for complex amalgam restorations. Summitt JB, Burgess JO, Kaiser DA, Rux HW, Dutton FB. Am J Dent; 1991 Dec; 4(6):268-72. PubMed ID: 1814348 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The retention of titanium pins in high-copper amalgam and their influence on its fracture resistance. Brackett WW, Johnston WM. Oper Dent; 1989 Dec; 14(3):136-41. PubMed ID: 2700383 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Retention of complex amalgam restorations using self-threading pins, amalgapins, and Amalgambond. Imbery TA, Hilton TJ, Reagan SE. Am J Dent; 1995 Jun; 8(3):117-21. PubMed ID: 8599585 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of distribution of resistance features in complex amalgam restorations. Summitt JB, Rindler EA, Robbins JW, Burgess JO. Oper Dent; 1994 Jun; 19(2):53-8. PubMed ID: 8008611 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Fracture resistance of four core materials with incorporated pins. Kao EC, Hart S, Johnston WM. Int J Prosthodont; 1989 Jun; 2(6):569-78. PubMed ID: 2701071 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Retention of pins in amalgam. Cooley RL, Marshall TD, Earnest L. Am J Dent; 1991 Feb; 4(1):37-9. PubMed ID: 2003894 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of core diameter and surface treatment on the retention of resin composite cores to prefabricated endodontic posts. Artopoulou II, O'Keefe KL, Powers JM. J Prosthodont; 2006 Feb; 15(3):172-9. PubMed ID: 16681499 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Fracture resistance of five pin-retained core build-up materials on teeth with and without extracoronal preparation. Burke FJ, Shaglouf AG, Combe EC, Wilson NH. Oper Dent; 2000 Feb; 25(5):388-94. PubMed ID: 11203847 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The retention of amalgam and composite resin by a smooth, reverse-tapered pin. Brackett WW, Bailey JH. Oper Dent; 1992 Feb; 17(4):152-5. PubMed ID: 1287596 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. In vitro tensile bond strength of adhesive cements to new post materials. O'Keefe KL, Miller BH, Powers JM. Int J Prosthodont; 2000 Feb; 13(1):47-51. PubMed ID: 11203608 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Influence of different transitional restorations on the fracture resistance of premolar teeth. Qualtrough AJ, Cawte SG, Wilson NH. Oper Dent; 2001 Feb; 26(3):267-72. PubMed ID: 11357569 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Load fatigue of five restoration modalities in structurally compromised premolars. Fan P, Nicholls JI, Kois JC. Int J Prosthodont; 1995 Feb; 8(3):213-20. PubMed ID: 10348588 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Adhesion of a new light-polymerized denture base resin to resin teeth and denture base materials. Hayakawa I, Hirano S, Nagao M, Matsumoto T, Masuhara E. Int J Prosthodont; 1991 Feb; 4(6):561-8. PubMed ID: 1817529 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The effects of three types of pins on the tensile strength of dental amalgam. Duperon DF, Kasloff Z. J Can Dent Assoc (Tor); 1973 Feb; 39(2):111-9. PubMed ID: 4510580 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Strength of amalgam restorations bonded with Amalgambond. Ianzano JA, Mastrodomenico J, Gwinnett AJ. Am J Dent; 1993 Feb; 6(1):10-2. PubMed ID: 8329154 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]