These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

312 related items for PubMed ID: 18037252

  • 1. Cochlear implant electrode configuration effects on activation threshold and tonotopic selectivity.
    Snyder RL, Middlebrooks JC, Bonham BH.
    Hear Res; 2008 Jan; 235(1-2):23-38. PubMed ID: 18037252
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Topographic spread of inferior colliculus activation in response to acoustic and intracochlear electric stimulation.
    Snyder RL, Bierer JA, Middlebrooks JC.
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2004 Sep; 5(3):305-22. PubMed ID: 15492888
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Identifying cochlear implant channels with poor electrode-neuron interfaces: electrically evoked auditory brain stem responses measured with the partial tripolar configuration.
    Bierer JA, Faulkner KF, Tremblay KL.
    Ear Hear; 2011 Sep; 32(4):436-44. PubMed ID: 21178633
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Monopolar intracochlear pulse trains selectively activate the inferior colliculus.
    Schoenecker MC, Bonham BH, Stakhovskaya OA, Snyder RL, Leake PA.
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2012 Oct; 13(5):655-72. PubMed ID: 22722899
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Electrical cochlear stimulation in the deaf cat: comparisons between psychophysical and central auditory neuronal thresholds.
    Beitel RE, Snyder RL, Schreiner CE, Raggio MW, Leake PA.
    J Neurophysiol; 2000 Apr; 83(4):2145-62. PubMed ID: 10758124
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Postoperative Electrocochleography from Hybrid Cochlear Implant users: An Alternative Analysis Procedure.
    Kim JS, Tejani VD, Abbas PJ, Brown CJ.
    Hear Res; 2018 Dec; 370():304-315. PubMed ID: 30393003
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Auditory cortical images of cochlear-implant stimuli: coding of stimulus channel and current level.
    Middlebrooks JC, Bierer JA.
    J Neurophysiol; 2002 Jan; 87(1):493-507. PubMed ID: 11784765
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Pure-Tone Masking Patterns for Monopolar and Phantom Electrical Stimulation in Cochlear Implants.
    Saoji AA, Koka K, Litvak LM, Finley CC.
    Ear Hear; 2018 Jan; 39(1):124-130. PubMed ID: 28700446
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Auditory prosthesis with a penetrating nerve array.
    Middlebrooks JC, Snyder RL.
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2007 Jun; 8(2):258-79. PubMed ID: 17265124
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Comparisons between detection threshold and loudness perception for individual cochlear implant channels.
    Bierer JA, Nye AD.
    Ear Hear; 2014 Jun; 35(6):641-51. PubMed ID: 25036146
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. A Guinea Pig Model Suggests That Objective Assessment of Acoustic Hearing Preservation in Human Ears With Cochlear Implants Is Confounded by Shifts in the Spatial Origin of Acoustically Evoked Potential Measurements Along the Cochlear Length.
    Lee C, Hartsock JJ, Salt AN, Lichtenhan JT.
    Ear Hear; 2014 Jun; 45(3):666-678. PubMed ID: 38178312
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Spatial selectivity to intracochlear electrical stimulation in the inferior colliculus is degraded after long-term deafness in cats.
    Vollmer M, Beitel RE, Snyder RL, Leake PA.
    J Neurophysiol; 2007 Nov; 98(5):2588-603. PubMed ID: 17855592
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Multichannel cochlear implants. Channel interactions and processor design.
    White MW, Merzenich MM, Gardi JN.
    Arch Otolaryngol; 1984 Aug; 110(8):493-501. PubMed ID: 6547597
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Predicting Postoperative Speech Perception and Audiometric Thresholds Using Intracochlear Electrocochleography in Cochlear Implant Recipients.
    Panario J, Bester C, O'Leary S.
    Ear Hear; 1984 Aug; 45(5):1173-1190. PubMed ID: 38816899
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Electrophysiological channel interactions using focused multipolar stimulation for cochlear implants.
    George SS, Shivdasani MN, Wise AK, Shepherd RK, Fallon JB.
    J Neural Eng; 2015 Dec; 12(6):066005. PubMed ID: 26401834
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Chronic electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve at high stimulus rates: a physiological and histopathological study.
    Xu J, Shepherd RK, Millard RE, Clark GM.
    Hear Res; 1997 Mar; 105(1-2):1-29. PubMed ID: 9083801
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Evaluation of focused multipolar stimulation for cochlear implants in acutely deafened cats.
    George SS, Wise AK, Shivdasani MN, Shepherd RK, Fallon JB.
    J Neural Eng; 2014 Dec; 11(6):065003. PubMed ID: 25420148
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 16.