These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

312 related items for PubMed ID: 18037252

  • 21. Guinea pig auditory nerve response triggered by a high density electrode array.
    Jolly CN, Clopton BM, Spelman FA, Lineaweaver SK.
    Med Prog Technol; 1997; 21 Suppl():13-23. PubMed ID: 9413824
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Extracochlear Stimulation of Electrically Evoked Auditory Brainstem Responses (eABRs) Remains the Preferred Pre-implant Auditory Nerve Function Test in an Assessor-blinded Comparison.
    Causon A, O'Driscoll M, Stapleton E, Lloyd S, Freeman S, Munro KJ.
    Otol Neurotol; 2019 Jan; 40(1):47-55. PubMed ID: 30489452
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Intensity coding in electric hearing: effects of electrode configurations and stimulation waveforms.
    Chua TE, Bachman M, Zeng FG.
    Ear Hear; 2011 Jan; 32(6):679-89. PubMed ID: 21610498
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Midbrain responses to micro-stimulation of the cochlea using high density thin-film arrays.
    Allitt BJ, Morgan SJ, Bell S, Nayagam DA, Arhatari B, Clark GM, Paolini AG.
    Hear Res; 2012 May; 287(1-2):30-42. PubMed ID: 22531007
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Plasticity in central representations in the inferior colliculus induced by chronic single- vs. two-channel electrical stimulation by a cochlear implant after neonatal deafness.
    Leake PA, Snyder RL, Rebscher SJ, Moore CM, Vollmer M.
    Hear Res; 2000 Sep; 147(1-2):221-41. PubMed ID: 10962187
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Cochleotopic selectivity of a multichannel scala tympani electrode array using the 2-deoxyglucose technique.
    Brown M, Shepherd RK, Webster WR, Martin RL, Clark GM.
    Hear Res; 1992 May; 59(2):224-40. PubMed ID: 1618713
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve: the effect of electrode position on neural excitation.
    Shepherd RK, Hatsushika S, Clark GM.
    Hear Res; 1993 Mar; 66(1):108-20. PubMed ID: 8473242
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Tripolar configuration and pulse shape in cochlear implants reduce channel interactions in the temporal domain.
    Quass GL, Kral A.
    Hear Res; 2024 Mar 01; 443():108953. PubMed ID: 38277881
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. An improved cochlear implant electrode array for use in experimental studies.
    Shepherd R, Verhoeven K, Xu J, Risi F, Fallon J, Wise A.
    Hear Res; 2011 Jul 01; 277(1-2):20-7. PubMed ID: 21540098
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Effects of Electrical Stimulation in the Inferior Colliculus on Frequency Discrimination by Rhesus Monkeys and Implications for the Auditory Midbrain Implant.
    Pages DS, Ross DA, Puñal VM, Agashe S, Dweck I, Mueller J, Grill WM, Wilson BS, Groh JM.
    J Neurosci; 2016 May 04; 36(18):5071-83. PubMed ID: 27147659
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Cortical responses to cochlear implant stimulation: channel interactions.
    Bierer JA, Middlebrooks JC.
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2004 Mar 04; 5(1):32-48. PubMed ID: 14564662
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Bilateral Changes of Spontaneous Activity Within the Central Auditory Pathway Upon Chronic Unilateral Intracochlear Electrical Stimulation.
    Basta D, Götze R, Gröschel M, Jansen S, Janke O, Tzschentke B, Boyle P, Ernst A.
    Otol Neurotol; 2015 Dec 04; 36(10):1759-65. PubMed ID: 26571409
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Pulse-rate discrimination deficit in cochlear implant users: is the upper limit of pitch peripheral or central?
    Zhou N, Mathews J, Dong L.
    Hear Res; 2019 Jan 04; 371():1-10. PubMed ID: 30423498
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Speech perception with mono- and quadrupolar electrode configurations: a crossover study.
    Mens LH, Berenstein CK.
    Otol Neurotol; 2005 Sep 04; 26(5):957-64. PubMed ID: 16151343
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Deafness alters auditory nerve fibre responses to cochlear implant stimulation.
    Sly DJ, Heffer LF, White MW, Shepherd RK, Birch MG, Minter RL, Nelson NE, Wise AK, O'Leary SJ.
    Eur J Neurosci; 2007 Jul 04; 26(2):510-22. PubMed ID: 17650121
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 16.