These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

445 related items for PubMed ID: 18044781

  • 1. Reply: geographic disparities and deceased donor liver transplantation within a single UNOS region.
    Goss JA, Barshes NR, Washburn WK.
    Liver Transpl; 2007 Dec; 13(12):1760; author reply 1761. PubMed ID: 18044781
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Geographic disparities in deceased donor liver transplantation within a single UNOS region.
    Barshes NR, Becker NS, Washburn WK, Halff GA, Aloia TA, Goss JA.
    Liver Transpl; 2007 May; 13(5):747-51. PubMed ID: 17457866
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Race and receipt of liver transplantation: location matters.
    Asrani SK, Kim WR, Kamath PS.
    Liver Transpl; 2010 Sep; 16(9):1009-12. PubMed ID: 20818737
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Streamlining the donor organ placement process: use of portable computers in the field.
    Klein DH, Graham WK, Kauffman HM, Wolf JS, Daily OP, Stockdreher DD, Boyd K, Hall S, Aeder M.
    Transplant Proc; 1996 Feb; 28(1):217-8. PubMed ID: 8644186
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Disparities in organ allocation and access to liver transplantation in the USA.
    Burr AT, Shah SA.
    Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2010 Apr; 4(2):133-40. PubMed ID: 20350260
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Are we ready to match donor and recipient in liver transplantation?
    Marino IR.
    Liver Transpl; 2006 Nov; 12(11):1574-6. PubMed ID: 17058247
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Disparities in access to liver transplantation in Spain.
    Miranda B, Cañón J, Cuende N, Garrido G, Naya MT, Fernández-Zincke E.
    Transplantation; 2003 Nov 15; 76(9):1398-403. PubMed ID: 14627924
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Deceased donor kidney and liver transplantation to nonresident aliens in the United States.
    Schold JD, Meier-Kriesche HU, Duncan RP, Reed AI.
    Transplantation; 2007 Dec 27; 84(12):1548-56. PubMed ID: 18165761
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score and organ allocation from cadaveric donors for 198 liver transplantation procedures performed in a single center.
    Santori G, Andorno E, Morelli N, Casaccia M, Bottino G, Ghirelli R, Valente U.
    Transplant Proc; 2008 Dec 27; 40(6):1903-5. PubMed ID: 18675084
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. MELD and PELD: application of survival models to liver allocation.
    Wiesner RH, McDiarmid SV, Kamath PS, Edwards EB, Malinchoc M, Kremers WK, Krom RA, Kim WR.
    Liver Transpl; 2001 Jul 27; 7(7):567-80. PubMed ID: 11460223
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Rescuing Prometheus: a policy proposal to alleviate excess demand for liver transplantation.
    Ferguson ME, Ferguson RM.
    Clin Transplant; 1997 Feb 27; 11(1):49-55. PubMed ID: 9067695
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Organ donors with exceptional medical conditions also count!
    Frutos MA, Mansilla JJ, Ruiz P, Lebrón M, Daga D, Guerrero F, Ortuño D, Carballo M, Parra D, Vázquez A.
    Transplant Proc; 2008 Nov 27; 40(9):2874-6. PubMed ID: 19010132
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Cadaveric organ sharing in the United States: 1988 through 1993.
    Kauffman HM, Ellison MD, Breen TJ, Daily OP, Pierce GA.
    Transplant Proc; 1996 Feb 27; 28(1):230-1. PubMed ID: 8644193
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Current Status of Simultaneous Liver-Kidney Transplantation in the United States.
    Lum EL, Cárdenas A, Martin P, Bunnapradist S.
    Liver Transpl; 2019 May 27; 25(5):797-806. PubMed ID: 30861294
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. MELD-based liver allocation: who is underserved?
    Biggins SW, Bambha K.
    Semin Liver Dis; 2006 Aug 27; 26(3):211-20. PubMed ID: 16850370
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Impact of new UNOS guidelines on donor heart allocation to circulatory assist device patients.
    Shinn JA.
    Prog Cardiovasc Nurs; 1999 Aug 27; 14(1):37-8. PubMed ID: 10431320
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Geographic favoritism in liver transplantation.
    Turcotte JG.
    N Engl J Med; 1999 Mar 25; 340(12):963; author reply 964-5. PubMed ID: 10094640
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Overview of the MELD/PELD system of liver allocation indications for liver transplantation in the MELD era: evidence-based patient selection.
    Freeman RB.
    Liver Transpl; 2004 Oct 25; 10(10 Suppl 2):S2-3. PubMed ID: 15382218
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. The impact of improvements in procurement and utilization on US liver recipients.
    Harper AM, Edwards EB, Daily OP, Lucas BA, Pritsker AA.
    Transplant Proc; 1997 Dec 25; 29(8):3444-6. PubMed ID: 9414784
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. A critical analysis of liver allograft utilization from the US deceased donor pool.
    Renz JF.
    Liver Transpl; 2010 May 25; 16(5):543-7. PubMed ID: 20440762
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 23.