These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

267 related items for PubMed ID: 18056883

  • 1. Contribution of high-frequency information to the acceptance of background noise in listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
    Plyler PN, Madix SG, Thelin JW, Johnston KW.
    Am J Audiol; 2007 Dec; 16(2):149-56. PubMed ID: 18056883
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Contribution of high frequencies to speech recognition in quiet and noise in listeners with varying degrees of high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss.
    Amos NE, Humes LE.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Aug; 50(4):819-34. PubMed ID: 17675588
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. The effects of speech presentation level on acceptance of noise in listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
    Freyaldenhoven MC, Plyler PN, Thelin JW, Hedrick MS.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Aug; 50(4):878-85. PubMed ID: 17675593
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Recognition of digits in different types of noise by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Smits C, Houtgast T.
    Int J Audiol; 2007 Mar; 46(3):134-44. PubMed ID: 17365067
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. The effect of extending high-frequency bandwidth on the acceptable noise level (ANL) of hearing-impaired listeners.
    Johnson E, Ricketts T, Hornsby B.
    Int J Audiol; 2009 Mar; 48(6):353-62. PubMed ID: 19925343
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Perceptual weighting of stop consonant cues by normal and impaired listeners in reverberation versus noise.
    Hedrick MS, Younger MS.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Apr; 50(2):254-69. PubMed ID: 17463228
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Audibility-index predictions of normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners' performance on the connected speech test.
    Sherbecoe RL, Studebaker GA.
    Ear Hear; 2003 Feb; 24(1):71-88. PubMed ID: 12598814
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. An Evaluation of the BKB-SIN, HINT, QuickSIN, and WIN Materials on Listeners With Normal Hearing and Listeners With Hearing Loss.
    Wilson RH, McArdle RA, Smith SL.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Aug; 50(4):844-56. PubMed ID: 17675590
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Speech perception in noise for children with auditory neuropathy/dys-synchrony type hearing loss.
    Rance G, Barker E, Mok M, Dowell R, Rincon A, Garratt R.
    Ear Hear; 2007 Jun; 28(3):351-60. PubMed ID: 17485984
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Word recognition performance in continuous and interrupted broad-band noise by normal-hearing and simulated hearing-impaired listeners.
    Stuart A, Phillips DP, Green WB.
    Am J Otol; 1995 Sep; 16(5):658-63. PubMed ID: 8588673
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Effects of noise, nonlinear processing, and linear filtering on perceived speech quality.
    Arehart KH, Kates JM, Anderson MC.
    Ear Hear; 2010 Jun; 31(3):420-36. PubMed ID: 20440116
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Perception of spectral contrast by hearing-impaired listeners.
    Dreisbach LE, Leek MR, Lentz JJ.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Aug; 48(4):910-21. PubMed ID: 16378482
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. The impact of listening condition on background noise acceptance for young adults with normal hearing.
    Gordon-Hickey S, Moore RE, Estis JM.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2012 Oct; 55(5):1356-72. PubMed ID: 22411277
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Spectral contributions to the benefit from spatial separation of speech and noise.
    Dubno JR, Ahlstrom JB, Horwitz AR.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2002 Dec; 45(6):1297-310. PubMed ID: 12546495
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Relations between frequency selectivity, temporal fine-structure processing, and speech reception in impaired hearing.
    Strelcyk O, Dau T.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 May; 125(5):3328-45. PubMed ID: 19425674
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. [Relation between pure tone audiometry and speech audiometry in various hearing-impaired listeners].
    He LP.
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 1993 May; 28(1):29-31, 59. PubMed ID: 8352994
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Interference and enhancement effects on interaural time discrimination and level discrimination in listeners with normal hearing and those with hearing loss.
    Smith-Olinde L, Besing J, Koehnke J.
    Am J Audiol; 2004 Jun; 13(1):80-95. PubMed ID: 15248807
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. On the limited transfer of information with noise-induced hearing loss.
    Smoorenburg GF.
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1990 Jun; 469():38-46. PubMed ID: 2356737
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Benefits of amplification for speech recognition in background noise.
    Turner CW, Henry BA.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Oct; 112(4):1675-80. PubMed ID: 12398472
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions in a group of professional singers who have normal pure-tone hearing thresholds.
    Hamdan AL, Abouchacra KS, Zeki Al Hazzouri AG, Zaytoun G.
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):360-77. PubMed ID: 18382377
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 14.