These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

207 related items for PubMed ID: 18057908

  • 1. Integrating the acoustics of running speech into the pure tone audiogram: a step from audibility to intelligibility and disability.
    Corthals P.
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2008; 60(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 18057908
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Audibility-index predictions of normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners' performance on the connected speech test.
    Sherbecoe RL, Studebaker GA.
    Ear Hear; 2003 Feb; 24(1):71-88. PubMed ID: 12598814
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. The performance/intensity function: an underused resource.
    Boothroyd A.
    Ear Hear; 2008 Aug; 29(4):479-91. PubMed ID: 18469711
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. The binaural intelligibility level difference in hearing-impaired listeners: the role of supra-threshold deficits.
    Goverts ST, Houtgast T.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 May; 127(5):3073-84. PubMed ID: 21117756
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Children's speech recognition scores: the Speech Intelligibility Index and proficiency factors for age and hearing level.
    Scollie SD.
    Ear Hear; 2008 Aug; 29(4):543-56. PubMed ID: 18469717
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Recognition of digits in different types of noise by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Smits C, Houtgast T.
    Int J Audiol; 2007 Mar; 46(3):134-44. PubMed ID: 17365067
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Comparison of hearing thresholds obtained using pure-tone behavioral audiometry, the Cantonese Hearing in Noise Test (CHINT) and cortical evoked response audiometry.
    Wong LL, Cheung C, Wong EC.
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2008 Jun; 128(6):654-60. PubMed ID: 18568500
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Audiovisual speech reception in noise and self-perceived hearing disability in sensorineural hearing loss.
    Corthals P, Vinck B, De Vel E, Van Cauwenberge P.
    Audiology; 1997 Jun; 36(1):46-56. PubMed ID: 9063560
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. The relationship between high-frequency pure-tone hearing loss, hearing in noise test (HINT) thresholds, and the articulation index.
    Vermiglio AJ, Soli SD, Freed DJ, Fisher LM.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 Jun; 23(10):779-88. PubMed ID: 23169195
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. [Intelligibility of monosyllables in relation to tone hearing in noise-induced hearing loss].
    Tymnik G, Stange E, Lessing G, Zobelt U.
    Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1987 Jun; 66(6):335-7. PubMed ID: 3626717
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Pure tone audiograms from hearing-impaired children. II. Predicting speech-hearing from the audiogram.
    Bamford JM, Wilson IM, Atkinson D, Bench J.
    Br J Audiol; 1981 Feb; 15(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 7214068
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. The effect of intensity perturbations on speech intelligibility for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    van Schijndel NH, Houtgast T, Festen JM.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 May; 109(5 Pt 1):2202-10. PubMed ID: 11386571
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Comparison of auditory steady-state responses and auditory brainstem responses in audiometric assessment of adults with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Lin YH, Ho HC, Wu HP.
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2009 Apr; 36(2):140-5. PubMed ID: 18620826
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Effect of speaker age on speech recognition and perceived listening effort in older adults with hearing loss.
    McAuliffe MJ, Wilding PJ, Rickard NA, O'Beirne GA.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2012 Jun; 55(3):838-47. PubMed ID: 22232404
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. The development of psychometrically equivalent Cantonese speech audiometry materials.
    Nissen SL, Harris RW, Channell RW, Conklin B, Kim M, Wong L.
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Mar; 50(3):191-201. PubMed ID: 21319936
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. The AMA method of estimation of hearing disability: a validation study.
    Dobie RA.
    Ear Hear; 2011 Mar; 32(6):732-40. PubMed ID: 21694598
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Prediction of the pure-tone average from the speech reception and auditory brainstem response thresholds in a geriatric population.
    Chien CH, Tu TY, Shiao AS, Chien SF, Wang YF, Li AC, Yang MJ.
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2008 Mar; 70(6):366-72. PubMed ID: 18984972
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Temporal envelope changes of compression and speech rate: combined effects on recognition for older adults.
    Jenstad LM, Souza PE.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Oct; 50(5):1123-38. PubMed ID: 17905900
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.