These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

424 related items for PubMed ID: 18068588

  • 1. Soft-tissue treatment changes in Class II Division 1 malocclusion with and without extraction of maxillary premolars.
    Janson G, Fuziy A, de Freitas MR, Castanha Henriques JF, de Almeida RR.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Dec; 132(6):729.e1-8. PubMed ID: 18068588
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Alignment stability in Class II malocclusion treated with 2- and 4-premolar extraction protocols.
    Janson G, Busato MC, Henriques JF, de Freitas MR, de Freitas LM.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Aug; 130(2):189-95. PubMed ID: 16905063
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Cephalometric evaluation of symmetric and asymmetric extraction treatment for patients with Class II subdivision malocclusions.
    Janson G, Carvalho PE, Cançado RH, de Freitas MR, Henriques JF.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jul; 132(1):28-35. PubMed ID: 17628247
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Long-term stability of Class II malocclusion treated with 2- and 4-premolar extraction protocols.
    Janson G, Leon-Salazar V, Leon-Salazar R, Janson M, de Freitas MR.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Aug; 136(2):154.e1-10; discussion 154-5. PubMed ID: 19651339
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Treatment stability in patients with Class II malocclusion treated with 2 maxillary premolar extractions or without extractions.
    Janson G, Camardella LT, Araki JD, de Freitas MR, Pinzan A.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Jul; 138(1):16-22. PubMed ID: 20620829
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Profile changes of patients treated with and without premolar extractions.
    Erdinc AE, Nanda RS, Dandajena TC.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Sep; 132(3):324-31. PubMed ID: 17826600
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Orthodontic treatment time in 2- and 4-premolar-extraction protocols.
    Janson G, Maria FR, Barros SE, Freitas MR, Henriques JF.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 May; 129(5):666-71. PubMed ID: 16679207
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Extraction of maxillary first permanent molars in patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusion.
    Stalpers MJ, Booij JW, Bronkhorst EM, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM, Katsaros C.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Sep; 132(3):316-23. PubMed ID: 17826599
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Long-term profile changes associated with successfully treated extraction and nonextraction Class II Division 1 malocclusions.
    Zierhut EC, Joondeph DR, Artun J, Little RM.
    Angle Orthod; 2000 Jun; 70(3):208-19. PubMed ID: 10926430
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Soft tissue changes after upper premolar extraction in Class II camouflage therapy.
    Scott Conley R, Jernigan C.
    Angle Orthod; 2006 Jan; 76(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 16448270
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Occlusal outcomes and efficiency of 1- and 2-phase protocols in the treatment of Class II Division 1 malocclusion.
    Cançado RH, Pinzan A, Janson G, Henriques JF, Neves LS, Canuto CE.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Feb; 133(2):245-53; quiz 328.e1-2. PubMed ID: 18249291
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Cephalometric comparison of maxillary second molar extraction and nonextraction treatments in patients with Class II malocclusions.
    Waters D, Harris EF.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Dec; 120(6):608-13; quiz 677. PubMed ID: 11742305
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Evaluation of posttreatment changes in Class II Division 1 patients after nonextraction orthodontic treatment: cephalometric and model analysis.
    Ciger S, Aksu M, Germeç D.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Feb; 127(2):219-23. PubMed ID: 15750542
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. [A retrospective study of morphologic basis for the extraction decision in Class II, division 1 malocclusion].
    Li Q, Zheng Z, Bai D, Pang G.
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1999 Nov; 17(4):341-3. PubMed ID: 12539381
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Influence of the cephalometric characteristics on the occlusal success rate of Class II malocclusions treated with nonextraction or with two maxillary premolar extraction protocols.
    Janson G, Simão TM, Barros SE, Janson M, de Freitas MR.
    World J Orthod; 2010 Nov; 11(4):e63-71. PubMed ID: 21490991
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Cephalometric changes in Class II division 1 patients treated with two maxillary premolars extraction.
    Seben MP, Valarelli FP, de Freitas KM, Cançado RH, Bittencourt Neto AC.
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2013 Nov; 18(4):61-9. PubMed ID: 24262418
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 22.